Listen to the narrated PowerPoint for the Chapter 6 Mini-Case: Mrs. Wantanabe and the Japanese Yen Carry Trade. This case discusses the mechanics and profitability of the carry trade and how, when gl

Case Discussion Rubric Page 1 of 2 Outs tanding 100 points Good 85 points Average 75 points Limited 65 points Flawed 55 points Demonstrates Careful Reading and Inquiry into Subject Discussion Post • Shows serious cont emplation of read ings. • Shows original thought that goes far beyond the obvious. Discussion Post • Indicates reading was completed. • Addresses some of the questions obvious answers. Discussion Post • Relies primarily on case summary Discussion Post • Suggests c ase scanned but not read carefully • Rehas hes ideas from other posts Discussion post • Gives little indication t hat the case was read and assignment completed. • The Post was not rel evant to the case questions or curr ent discussion. Responsibly cited and provides examples Quo tes used : • suppo rt writer’s po int (“proves ” it) • are origina l (unexpec ted quo te cho ice s and /or use s quo tes from multiple place s of the tex t) • prope rly integ rated into the discussion • Properly punctu ated Quo tes used : • suppo rt writ er’s po int (“proves ” it) • are so mewha t pred ictab le • are no t we ll integ rated into discussion • so me mechan ica l and/or docu men tation errors So me quo tes are used , bu t: • The re are too few exa mples; relies mos tly on gene raliza tion s • So me quo tes do no t effec tive ly suppo rt writ er’s po int • quo tes are poo rly integ rated • citation errors • Diction is ordina ry So me quo tes are used , bu t: • Pa raph rase do mina tes • quo tes use d are no t integ rated • Quo tes do no t mak e sens e as suppo rt • Quo ted material is ou t of con tex t • Fa ils to us e cap ital letters or punc tua tion No quo tes are used ; tex tua l ev idenc e (eve n pa raph rase d ev idence ) is fli msy and /or inapp rop riate • Citation s are missing Case Discussion Rubric Page 2 of 2 • Qu otes are properly cited. • Con tains multiple docu men tation errors Outs tanding 100 points Good 85 points Average 75 points Limited 65 points Flawed 55 points Engagem ent with Others • Show s conce rted an d hones t effort to engag e with othe rs • Respond s to idea s in a wa y tha t advance s discuss ion beyon d the obv iou s • Interac ts eas ily & accu rately with othe r pos ts in the threa d Responds in the way highlighted above at least 5 times. • Show s atten tion to othe r pos ts in the threa d • Inco rpo rate s an d acknow led ge s idea s of othe rs in attempt to advanc e the discuss ion (pe rhap s in pred ictab le ways ) Responds the way described above 3 -4 times. • Offers littl e interac tion with othe r pos ts in the threa d • M os tly su mm arize s wha t othe rs hav e said withou t add ing to discuss ion Responds in the way described above 1-2 times . • Doe s no t acknow ledg e othe r pos ts • M isrep resen ts con ten t of othe r pos ts • Igno res othe r pos ts in threa d • Doe s no t engage with othe rs