I need you to find two clinical reasoning errors from my interventions in part B file and go with the instructions. Introduction (300 words) Provide a very brief overview of your clinical encounter th
Criterion | High Distinction (HD) |
Provides a contextualised overview of the clinical encounter that clearly highlights the points where the nominated clinical reasoning errors occur. 20% | clearly and correctly identified two clinical reasoning errors with robust justification for their application to your clinical encounter. You have demonstrated exceptional understanding of clinical reasoning errors. |
Demonstrates an understanding of relevant clinical reasoning errors associated with the clinical encounter and its impact on patient outcomes. 30% | Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of relevant clinical reasoning errors through clear succinct definitions, exploration and alignment to clinical encounter that highlights impact/s on patient outcomes. |
Demonstrates the ability to reflect on own professional practice to inform future nursing practice as a beginning level practitioner 30% | Demonstrates capacity in critical reflection through sound reasoning and inquiry. Critical reflection has directly, clearly and logically informed requirements for future practice. |
Uses appropriate scholarly literature to substantiate findings throughout. Uses Harvard referencing style 10% | Accurately references all sources using the Harvard style. Outstanding use of appropriate academic literature that substantiates thinking and arguments that considers evidence-based practice relevant to the encounter. |
Writes in a clear and concise academic style that is succinct, logical and coherent. 10% | Communicates with a highly evolved academic writing style with strong evidence of planning. The paper is exceptionally logical, insightful and balanced and is consistently expressed in a clear and fluent manner with minimal or no spelling/grammar errors. |