I do need a well quality work on an Evidence- base paper and table for nursing program. I have attached the guideline, sample of 3 needed table, and the 4 articles with references to assist in writin

Evaluation Table

Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Full citation of selected article	Article #1	Article #2	Article #3	Article #4
Use APA format to completely cite the peer-reviewed, reference article published in the last five (5) years.
Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study	The theoretical framework of this investigation is the Neuman Systems Model.
Design/Method Describe the design and how the study was carried out Th	The method is quantitative, The design is quasi-experimental (matched-random design).
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc.	The setting is a school within a state-run residential living facility in the SE portion of the US. The sample is comprised of 230 adolescent females, 12-18 years of age. The average residential stay at this facility is 2.7 years. Participants are African American (20%), Caucasian (60%), Latina (12 %), Native American 1%, and Mixed Race (7%). All participants were assigned to this facility due to illicit behavior that included the use of illegal substances, stealing, and/or violence toward another. There was 0% attrition. No one entered the intervention after the start of the self-help group. No one in the study was discharged from the facility or left the group of their own accord.
Major Variables Studied List and define dependent and independent variables	IV– personality types IV- educational self-help group (14 sessions) DV- reaction to stressors
Measurement Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions	SPSS Syntax Commands for a 2-group, matched random assignment – within-subjects ANOVA/ T-test
Data Analysis Statistical or qualitative findings	Report statistical findings here
Findings and Recommendations General findings and recommendations of the research	Report here if findings are significant (why/why not). State any recommendations made by the authors here also.
Appraisal Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of the study? What are the risks associated with the implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of use in your practice?	How does this information support your overall PICO question? Does it answer any part of that question? Can you use the findings to build an evidence-based intervention? Supply a rationale for this belief based on the strengths and/or limitations of the study. DN NOT SAY there were not enough participants. Instead, SAY the findings were not statistically significant due to the small number of participants (or sample size).\ Based on evidence and your experience, are there any risks associated with implementing an intervention based on these findings? For example, since the study was a pilot study, replication and expansion of this investigation are needed to determine the value and reliability of the findings to practice. How “usable” are the findings to your practice? In other words, would it be easy to implement? Would your organization have to purchase expensive instruments, machines, supplies? Would nursing staff require training, and if so how much? What other questions could you ask about the viability of implementation?
General Notes/Comments	Did anything else stand out that you believe needs commentary here?

Levels of Evidence Table

Use this document to complete the levels of evidence table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Author and year of selected article	Article #1	Article #2	Article #3	Article #4
Jones, A. (2019).
Study Design Theoretical basis for the study	Health Belief Model
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients	Records from 213 surgical patients in a veterans hospital in the SW portion of the US were part of this investigation. Patients were 80% male, with diverse ethnic backgrounds (40% AA, 45% C, 5% other).
Evidence Level * (I, II, or III)	Level III – a retrospective study
Outcomes	Individuals treated with antibiotic pearls recovered from orthopedic infections 23% faster than those treated with oral or IV antibiotics.
General Notes/Comments	Anything else of interest from the study? If females responded differently to the treatment, a specific type of orthopedic surgical recovery had a more significant finding, etc., place that information here.

* Evidence Levels:

Level I

Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis

Level II

Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis

Level III

Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis

Level IV

Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence

Level V

Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence

Outcomes Synthesis Table

Use this document to complete the outcomes synthesis table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Author and year of selected article	Article #1	Article #2	Article #3	Article #4
Jackson, A. (2018)
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients	300 babies (3 months 0 18 months of age) in a treatment clinic for developmental disabilities. All participants subjected to cocaine inter utero. The gender was 72% female.
Outcomes	A bundle combination focused on developmental milestones by age were more effective than single interventions. An increase in developmental achievement was noted to be 32% with the bundle intervention as opposed to 17% with the traditional treatment methods used at this site.
Key Findings	Combining physical therapy, occupational therapy, nutrition an cognitive stimulation proved to be most effective with this sample population.
Appraisal and Study Quality	The study was a pilot investigation. Funding from ____ has been obtained to expand this intervention type to 13 additional sites treating babies with the same exposure to cocaine.
General Notes/Comments	Anything else of interest?