For this assignment, consider the organization where you currently work or an organization where you may have worked in the past as a point of reference for evaluating the coaching model and team-base

Points: 250 Assignment 2: Coaching Model Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Fair 70 -79% C Proficient 80 -89% B Exemplary 90 -100% A 1. Classify the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following: Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coaching, or Strategic Coaching. Judge the extent to which the identified coaching model has worked to opt imize the organization’s performance management activities. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely classified the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following: Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coac hing, or Strategic Coaching.

Did not submit or incompletely judged the extent to which the identified coaching model has worked to optimize the organization’s performance management activities. Partially classified the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following:

Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coaching, or Strategic Coaching.

Partially judged the extent to which the identified coaching model has worked to optimize the organization’s performance manag ement activities. Satisfactorily classified the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following:

Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coaching, or Strategic Coaching.

Satisfactorily judged the extent to which the identified coaching model has worked to optimize the organization’s performance management activities. Thoroughly classified the selected organization’s approach to coaching as it relates to one (1) of the following:

Ad Hoc Coaching, Managing Coaching, Proactive Coaching, or Strategic Coaching.

Thoroughly judged the extent to which the identified coaching m odel has worked to optimize the organization’s performance management activities. 2. Recommend three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3: Best Practices for Manager -Coaches in the textbook. Justify each element as it relates to optimizing performance. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely recommended three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3: Best Practices for Manager -Coaches in the textbook. Did not submit or incompletely justified each element as it relates to optimizing performance. Partially recommended three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3: Best Practices for Manager - Coaches in the textboo k. Partially justified each element as it relates to optimizing performance. Satisfactorily recommended three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3:

Best Practices for Manager - Coaches in the textbook.

Satis factorily justified each element as it relates to optimizing performance. Thoroughly recommended three (3) practices to improve the selected organization’s current performance from Table 4.3: Best Practices for Manager - Coaches in the textbook.

Thoroughly justified each element as it relates to optimizing performance. 3. Construct five (5) best practices that would maximize team -based performance in the selected organization.

Specify the primary Did not submit or incompletely constructed five (5) best practices that would maximize team -based Partially constructed five (5) best practices that would maximize team - based Satisfactorily constructed five (5) best practices that would maximize team - based Thoroughly constructed five (5) best practices that would maximize team - based manner in which each practice aligns with the organization’s o verall goals and vision. Weight: 25% performance in the selected organization. Did not submit or incompletely specified the primary manner in which each pract ice aligns with the organization’s overall goals and vision. performance in the selected organization.

Partially specified the primary manner in which each practice aligns with th e organization’s overall goals and vision. performance in the selected organization.

Satisfactorily specified the primary manner in which each practice aligns with the organi zation’s overall goals and vision. performance in the selected organization.

Thoroughly specified the primary manner in which each practice aligns with the organization’s overall goals and vision. 4. 3 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 5. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting Weight: 5% Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Partially free of errors in grammar, spell ing, punctuation, or formatting. Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. 6. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference Weight: 5% Lack of in -text citations and / or lack of reference section. In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style. Most in -text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style. In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style. 7. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources Weight: 5% Serious errors in the integration of sources, such a s intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in -text citations. Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, parap hrasing, and summarizing. Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. 8. Clarity and Coherence of Writing Weight: 5% Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is mostly clear and generally supporte d with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.