I have to write a written project in APA style attached is the outline and example our the paper you should follow.  The Topic of my written project is "Global Warming" no more than 8 pages including

Outline for the Final Written Project

The Final written Project must conform to the following outline and the APA citation format. A title page is not required.

Introduction:

This should include a brief description of the scope and magnitude of the controversy. Include relevant statistics and data from reliable sources such as FBI Statistical Data, Labor Department, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid.

I. Views of the Proponents:

In this section you will provide the essential views of the proponents, including their reasoning and evidentiary support for their reasoning such as statistics and specific arguments. Here you will paraphrase the comments made by proponents and reference in the APA format.

I. Views of the Opponents:

In this section you will provide the essential views of the opponents, including their reasoning and evidentiary support for their reasoning, such as statistics and specific arguments. Here you will paraphrase the comments made by opponents and reference according in the APA format.

II. Analysis of the Views of the Proponents via the Critical Questions in Browne and Keeley:

Here you must “ask and answer” all the critical questions in your analysis of the views of the proponents of your selected controversy. You may do so in narrative form.

What are the issue and conclusion?

What are the Reasons?

What words or phrases are ambiguous?

What are the value conflicts and assumptions?

What are the descriptive assumptions?

Are there Fallacies in the reasoning?

How good is the evidence supporting the views and arguments of the proponents?

Are there Rival Causes?

Are the statistics deceptive?

What significant information is omitted?

What conclusions are possible?

II. Analysis of the Views of the Opponents via the Critical Questions in Browne and Keeley:

Here you must “ask and answer” all the critical questions in your analysis of the views of the opponents of your selected controversy. You may do so in narrative form.

What are the issue and conclusion?

What are the Reasons?

What words or phrases are ambiguous?

What are the value conflicts and assumptions?

What are the descriptive assumptions?

Are there Fallacies in the reasoning?

How good is the evidence supporting the views and arguments of the opponents?

Are there Rival Causes?

Are the statistics deceptive?

What significant information is omitted?

What conclusions are possible?

III. Arguments:

After you have analyzed the views of the proponents and opponents, you will provide one argument in support of a position or claim of the proponents or opponents and one argument refuting a position or claim of the proponents or opponents with additional supportive evidence. Your arguments should be based on the identification of flaws in the reasoning, not merely opinion.

  1. Argument in support of a position or claim of the proponents or opponents with additional evidence:

  2. Argument refuting a position or claim of the proponents or opponents with additional evidence: