Consider your future practice as a counselor, keeping in mind a population and/or setting for your work. The Final Course Project is a synthesis of literature and it is aimed to help you determine the
| Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Unacceptable |
Topic is suitable to advance research in advancing the counseling profession | Points Range:21 (7.00%) - 25 (8.33333%) Topic is suitable to advance research in advancing the counseling profession and the author's personal knowledge of counseling. | Points Range:16 (5.33333%) - 20 (6.66666%) Topic is minimally suitable to advance research in advancing the counseling profession and the author's personal knowledge of counseling. | Points Range:11 (3.66666%) - 15 (5.00%) Topic weakly aligns with the counseling field. | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10 (3.33333%) Topic has nothing to do with the counseling field |
Paper includes at least 10 research based articles that relate to the topic | Points Range:21 (7.00%) - 25 (8.33333%) Paper includes at least 10 research articles, where at least 8 are empirical research. Articles are within the last 10 years and relate to the topic. | Points Range:16 (5.33333%) - 20 (6.66666%) Paper includes at least 9 research articles, where at least 7 are empirical research. Articles are within the last 12 years and relate to the topic. | Points Range:11 (3.66666%) - 15 (5.00%) Paper includes at least 6 research articles, where at least 7 are empirical research. Articles are more than 13 years old and/or weakly relate to the topic. | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10 (3.33333%) Less than 6 articles are used in the paper and/or the articles are out of date and/or do not relate to the topic |
Background of the topic area | Points Range:41 (13.66666%) - 50 (16.66666%) Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1 – 2 supporting details and/or examples for each of the required components of the section. | Points Range:31 (10.33333%) - 40 (13.33333%) Information clearly relates to the main topic but supporting details/examples are weakly aligned to the topic. Does not address one of the main components of the section | Points Range:21 (7.00%) - 30 (10.00%) Information is minimal and presented with vague or incomplete examples and/or does not address two or more of the main components of the section | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 20 (6.66666%) Information has little to nothing to do with the main topic. Addresses the components of the section weakly or not at all. |
Results | Points Range:41 (13.66666%) - 50 (16.66666%) Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1 – 2 supporting details and/or examples for each of the required components of the section. | Points Range:31 (10.33333%) - 40 (13.33333%) Information clearly relates to the main topic but supporting details/examples are weakly aligned to the topic. Does not address one of the main components of the section | Points Range:21 (7.00%) - 30 (10.00%) Information is minimal and presented with vague or incomplete examples and/or does not address two or more of the main components of the section | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 20 (6.66666%) Information has little to nothing to do with the main topic. Addresses the components of the section weakly or not at all. |
Discussion | Points Range:41 (13.66666%) - 50 (16.66666%) Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1 – 2 supporting details and/or examples for each of the required components of the section. | Points Range:31 (10.33333%) - 40 (13.33333%) Information clearly relates to the main topic but supporting details/examples are weakly aligned to the topic. Does not address one of the main components of the section. | Points Range:21 (7.00%) - 30 (10.00%) Information is minimal and presented with vague or incomplete examples and/or does not address two or more of the main components of the section | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 20 (6.66666%) Information has little to nothing to do with the main topic. Addresses the components of the section weakly or not at all. |
Implications | Points Range:41 (13.66666%) - 50 (16.66666%) Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1 – 2 supporting details and/or examples for each of the required components of the section. | Points Range:31 (10.33333%) - 40 (13.33333%) Information clearly relates to the main topic but supporting details/examples are weakly aligned to the topic. Does not address one of the main components of the section. | Points Range:21 (7.00%) - 30 (10.00%) Information is minimal and presented with vague or incomplete examples and/or does not address two or more of the main components of the section. | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 20 (6.66666%) Information has little to nothing to do with the main topic. Addresses the components of the section weakly or not at all. |
Mechanics and style formatting | Points Range:21 (7.00%) - 25 (8.33333%) Few notable grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors | Points Range:16 (5.33333%) - 20 (6.66666%) 3-5 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors | Points Range:11 (3.66666%) - 15 (5.00%) More than 5 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10 (3.33333%) Numerous grammatical and punctuation errors. Paper reads incoherently. |
Overall Organization and Presentation | Points Range:21 (7.00%) - 25 (8.33333%) Report is organized in overall format with few notable APA errors. Does not go over or under the page limit. | Points Range:16 (5.33333%) - 20 (6.66666%) Report is organized in overall format with more than 5 notable APA errors. Paper is one page over 14 pages or under the limit of 8 pages. | Points Range:11 (3.66666%) - 15 (5.00%) Report is lacking overall organization and includes numerous APA errors | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10 (3.33333%) Report is not organized to standards presented in the course and contains numerous APA errors. Two or more pages over or under the page limit. |
Name: CNDV 5353 Final Project Rubric 2.0
Description: Rubric for CNDV 5353 Final Project
Grid View
List View
Name:CNDV 5353 Final Project Rubric 2.0
Description:Rubric for CNDV 5353 Final Project