Final Paper (200 points) Statement State legislatures continue to advance policy proposals to address cyber threats directed at governments and private businesses. As threats continue to evolve and ex

Running Head: THE FAILED AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY THE KENTUCKY LEGISLATURE IN 2019 WITH RESPECT TO CYBER POLICY 0

Kentucky legislative failed amendment in 2019

12/8/2019

The failed amendments that were proposed by the Kentucky legislature concerning cyber policy is one of the 2019 State legislatures. The council was developed because the state legislative body had to proceed with the advancement of policy proposals to address cyber issues that can interrupt or cause damage to state governments and other private organizations. However, Kentucky saw these amendments crucial because these risks and dangers had continued to develop and increase, while the pace of other innovations progress, and the federal bodies giving cyber-security methods a lot of concern. According to (Cynthia, 2019), Kentucky proposed the track legislation which needed every individual covered from where he works, either nationally, regionally, or internationally. Additionally, he indicated that all members of governments or other agencies should collaborate as a team to ensure that every individual is within the loop with the Track bill. Nonetheless, his amendment proposed that there should be useful legislative information updates to stakeholders.

Kentucky's amendment included distinct regions of administrative actions that needed the government bodies and organizations to actualize training programs or explicit forms of security approaches and practices. Moreover, it demanded teams or commissions be established. Additionally, governmental agencies were to be rebuilt to ensure improved security. The other key area involved learning the utilization of blockchains that guarantee cybersecurity (Cynthia, 2019).

Why the amendment failed

Kentucky's amendment failed since various states did not comply with the set rules and regulations of the proposed bill. Again, the Kentucky Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers illustrates that this amendment failed because it never correctly indicated what Marsy's Law might perform. The next form of speculation that is known to have caused the failure of this amendment is because the Kentucky constitution never gave permissions for a concise presentation of the proposed reformation. Furthermore, none of the funding suggested was presented by this law towards ensuring security to state governments and other private organizations. There was also a lot of confusion since the original language that involved the 556-word amendment was complicated and challenging to understand (John, 2019).

What to propose for them to pass come 2020

First and foremost, I would recommend for them to enact early voting come 2020 to determine if the amendment will fail again. This would include suggesting a comprehensive study of the cyber-security principles of each member in the government to ensure that there are no obligations in information technology that happened in the previous year. It would again be useful if the voting rights that led to the failure of the amendment are restored to ensure every member from the agencies votes in 2020 (Chris, 2019). Additionally, I would propose that the measures that advance the voting process and stop the different barriers that affect the voting process be passed to prevent this failure from occurring again.

A bill that demands every government should receive the appropriate fund to ensure that all-important tools and resources are installed to prevent cyber threats from occurring again should be passed. Furthermore, I would propose there be a measure of appropriating where each state government should obtain and put into practice the cybersecurity regulations, standards, and policies created by the legislative body. Lastly, I would propose the bill of ensuring that there is transparency in every step of maintaining security in these organizations that are applied come 2020. For instance, the law should ensure there is scrutiny to stop confusion and issues which bring difficulties in the measures of preventing cyber risks. Generally, government agencies should work together in unity to prevent the failure of Kentucky's amendment come 2020. However, this would stop the cyber threats from increasing every year (Amina, 2019).

References

Amina, (2019) Election 2019: The Race for Kentucky Secretary Of State | WEKU. Retrieved Oct 27, 2019, from https://www.weku.fm/post/election-2019-race-kentucky-secretary-state

Chris Delaubenfels. (2019) 2019 Voting Legislation - Let America Vote Retrieved 2019, from https://www.letamericavote.org/2019-voting-legislation/

Cynthia Brumfield, (2019) the cyber security legislation agenda: 5 areas to watch | CSO Online. Retrieved Feb 21, 2019, from https://www.csoonline.com/article/3341383/the-cybersecurity-legislation-agenda-5-areas-to-watch.html

John, (2019) Citing Vague Ballot Wording, Kentucky Supreme Court Strikes Crime Victims Amendment. Retrieved June 17, 2019, from https://www.governing.com/topics/public-justice-safety/tns-kentucky-court-strikes-marseys-law.html