9-1 Final Project Submission: White Paper Hide Assignment InformationTurnitinThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin. Instructions For your final project submission, you will submit the followin

Assignments View Feedbacks

Feedback for 3-2 Final Project Milestone One: Bankruptcy

Submission Feedback

Good work. Thank you.

Rubric Name: ACC 690 Milestone One Rubric

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.

Criteria

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Incorporation: Voluntary Bankruptcy

30 points

Summarizes the key points of interest if the company had to file voluntary bankruptcy and discusses the ethical implications that should be considered

21 points

Summarizes the key points of interest if the company had to file voluntary bankruptcy, but does not discuss the ethical implications that should be considered, or discussion is cursory or has inaccuracies

0 points

Does not summarize the key points of interest if the company had to file voluntary bankruptcy

30 / 30

Criterion Feedback

You showed good understanding of the voluntary bankruptcy.

Incorporation: Forced Bankruptcy

30 points

Identifies the key areas of concern if the company was forced into bankruptcy and the defenses available in this situation

21 points

Identifies the key areas of concern if the company was forced into bankruptcy but does not identify defenses available, or identification is cursory or has inaccuracies

0 points

Does not identify the key areas of concern if the company was forced into bankruptcy

30 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Good and detailed information.

Incorporation: Liquidate

30 points

Correctly illustrates hypothetical calculations

21 points

Illustrates hypothetical calculations but there are inaccuracies

0 points

Does not illustrate hypothetical calculations

30 / 30

Criterion Feedback

You provided good and reasonable example.

Articulation of Response

10 points

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

7 points

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

0 points

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

10 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Your work is well presented and written.

Rubric Total Score

Total

100 / 100

Overall Score

Points earned out of 100

The overall submission earned 71 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Points earned out of 100

The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Points earned out of 100

The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Score

60 / 60 - A

Feedback Date

Nov 17, 2019 8:59 AM

Assignment

3-2 Final Project Milestone One: Bankruptcy

Submission(s)

Turnitin® Similarity

Date Submitted

3-2 Final Project Milestone One Partn... (22.59 KB)

41 % Similar

41 %

Nov 14, 2019 11:18 PM

Calculation.xlsx (9.92 KB)

0 % Similar

0 %

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Feedback for 5-2 Final Project Milestone Two: Interim and Segment Reporting

Submission Feedback

Thank you Yvonne. Please read the graded rubrics.

Rubric Name: ACC 690 Milestone Two Rubric

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.

Criteria

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Incorporation: Interim Reporting

15 points

Describes the interim reporting requirements the company would have as a corporation and the guidance related to interim financial statements under GAAP and IFRS

10.5 points

Describes the interim reporting requirements the company would have as a corporation but does not describe the guidance related to interim financial statements under GAAP and IFRS, or description is cursory or has inaccuracies

0 points

Does not describe the interim reporting requirements

15 / 15

Criterion Feedback

Nice and reasonable analysis.

Incorporation: Financial Statement

15 points

Correctly generates a hypothetical financial statement illustrating what the interim reporting entails

10.5 points

Generates a hypothetical financial statement illustrating what the interim reporting entails, but there are inaccuracies

0 points

Does not generate a hypothetical financial statement

15 / 15

Criterion Feedback

Good example.

Incorporation: GAAP and IFRS

15 points

Determines if the interim reporting requirements are the same under GAAP and IFRS and provides an academic example to support response

10.5 points

Determines if the interim reporting requirements are the same under GAAP and IFRS but does not provide an academic example, or example provided does not support response

0 points

Does not determine if the interim reporting requirements are the same under GAAP and IFRS

15 / 15

Criterion Feedback

You showed understanding of the IFRS and US GAAP.

Incorporation: Segments Reported Separately

15 points

Appraises one of the processes used to identify which segments would have to be reported separately and provides academic example to support response

10.5 points

Appraises one of the processes used to identify which segments would have to be reported separately but does not provide academic example to support response, or appraisal is cursory or has inaccuracies

0 points

Does not appraise one of the processes

10.5 / 15

Criterion Feedback

Your discussion for this part needed to be more detailed and sufficient.

Incorporation: Transparency in Financial Reporting

15 points

Evaluates the effectiveness of the process in supporting transparency in financial reporting and academically defends response

10.5 points

Evaluates the effectiveness of the process in supporting transparency in financial reporting but does not defend response, or defense is weak or illogical

0 points

Does not evaluate the effectiveness of the process in supporting transparency infinancial reporting

10.5 / 15

Criterion Feedback

Your discussion for this part needed to be more detailed and sufficient.

Incorporation: Suggestions to Improve Transparency

15 points

Provides suggestions to improve the process for transparency and academically defends rationale

10.5 points

Provides suggestions to improve the process but does not defend rationale, or defense is weak or illogical

0 points

Does not provide suggestions to improve the process

10.5 / 15

Criterion Feedback

Your discussion for this part needed to be more detailed and sufficient.

Articulation of Response

10 points

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

7 points

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

0 points

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

10 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Your work is well presented.

Rubric Total Score

Total

86.5 / 100

Overall Score

Points earned out of 100

The overall submission earned 71 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Points earned out of 100

The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Points earned out of 100

The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Score

53.9 / 60 - A-

Feedback Date

Nov 28, 2019 10:38 AM

Assignment

5-2 Final Project Milestone Two: Interim and Segment Reporting

Submission(s)

Turnitin® Similarity

Date Submitted

ACC 690 5-2 Final Project Milestone T... (42 KB)

37 % Similar

37 %

Nov 26, 2019 11:18 PM

ACC 690 Milestone 2 excel grant.xlsx (14.87 KB)

59 % Similar

59 %

Feedback for 7-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Foreign Currency Transactions and Statements

Submission Feedback

Nice work Yvonne. Thank you.

Rubric Name: ACC 690 Milestone Three Rubric

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.

Criteria

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Incorporation: Impact of Foreign Exchange Rates

30 points

Summarizes the impact of foreign exchange rates on the financial statements and determines the risks

they pose, providing academically supported example

22.5 points

Summarizes the impact of foreign exchange rates on the financial statements but does not determine the

risks they pose, or summary is cursory, not supported, or has inaccuracies

0 points

Does not summarize the impact of foreign exchange rates on the financial statements

30 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Good understanding of the effects of the foreign rates.

Incorporation: Two Methods to Translate Financial Statements

30 points

Describes the two methods used to translate financial statements and how

the functional currency plays a role in determining which is used, with academic support

22.5 points

Describes the two methods used to translate financial statements but does

not describe how the functional currency plays a role in determining which is used, or description is cursory or has inaccuracies

0 points

Does not describe the two methods of translation

30 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Good examples.

Incorporation: Demonstrate the Translation Process

30 points

Composes a hypothetical example demonstrating the translation process using the two methods and ensures all

information is entered accurately

22.5 points

Composes a hypothetical example demonstrating the translation process using the two methods but contains

inaccuracies

0 points

Does not compose a hypothetical example

30 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Good explanation of the translation process.

Articulation of Response

10 points

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

7.5 points

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

0 points

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

10 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Your paper is well presented.

Rubric Total Score

Total

100 / 100

Overall Score

Points earned out of 100

The overall submission earned 76 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Points earned out of 100

The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Points earned out of 100

The overall submission earned 0 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

Score

60 / 60 - A

Feedback Date

Dec 12, 2019 8:22 AM

Assignment

7-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Foreign Currency Transactions and Statements

Submission(s)

Turnitin® Similarity

Date Submitted

ACC 690 7-2 Final Project Milestone T... (20.44 KB)

10 % Similar

10 %

Dec 10, 2019 12:41 PM

ACC 690 milestone 3 spreadsheet.xlsx (10.61 KB)

11 % Similar

11 %

Done