Knowledge of Subject Matter (40 pts) | Student showed depth of knowledge of subject matter well beyond citing the textbook; writer cited more than the minimum number of references; all statements and opinions were supported by appropriate citations from the literature. 40 – 36 points | Student showed knowledge of subject matter beyond citing the textbook; writer cited the minimum number of references; most statements and opinions were supported by appropriate citations from the literature. 35 – 32 points | Student showed knowledge of subject matter primarily limited to the textbook; writer cited the minimum number of references; some statements and opinions were not supported by appropriate citations from the literature. 31 – 28 points | Student showed little knowledge of subject matter; writer may not have cited the minimum number of references; many statements and opinions were not supported by appropriate citations from the literature. 27 points | |
Quality of Research (30 pts) | Student did an exceptional job of integrating course readings with additional research. Sources listed were all scholarly or practitioner journals, newspapers, or academic books from the last ten years. 30 – 27 points | Student did a satisfactory job of integrating course readings with additional research. Sources listed were primarily scholarly or practitioner journals, newspapers, or academic books from the last ten years. 26 – 24 points | Student did a less than satisfactory job of integrating course readings with additional research. Some sources listed were not scholarly or practitioner journals, newspapers, or academic books from the last ten years. 23 – 21 points | Student did an inadequate job of integrating course readings with additional research. Many of the sources listed were not scholarly or practitioner journals, newspapers, or academic books from the last ten years. 20 points | |