Guidelines for Submission - Word document with double spacing,12-point Times New Roman font,. Paper must be original, please. This paper will be uploaded to Turnitin. Case 1-3 Eating Time Kevin Lowe

ACC 696 Case Study 1 Rubric This course includes four case studies. These case studies are designed to actively involve you in ethical decision -making in accounting and to help you apply the concepts covered in the course to complex real -world situations. These case studies provide practice assessing a profession al situation, applying what you ha ve learned, and making an informed decision. Please review the evaluation criteria in the rubric below, which highlights grading information. Prompt : Read Case Study 1-7 in your text and answer the questions that follow. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Case Analysis Meets “P roficient” criter ia and provides examples Analyzes case study questions with details and explanations Analyzes case study questions with minor gaps in details and explanations; has difficulty in applying both technical and communicative proficiency Does not provide in-dept h analysis for the required case study questions 40 Conclusions Meets “P roficient” criteria , and conclusions are compared to current workplace scenarios Draws conclusions that are justified with evidence Draw s logical conclusions , but does not defend with evidence Does not draw logical conclusions 35 Articulation of Response Meets “P roficient” criteria and is presented in a professional and easy -to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization and is of a sufficient length to provide necessary details in answering the question Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas . Answers are brief and lacking in detail Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas . Answers fail to address all parts of the question or omit important details 25 Earned Total 100%