Court Procedures 4 pages NO plagiarisms Please Accepting offers

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 150	Assignment 1: Procedural Law and the Bill of Rights
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Compare and contrast two of the sources of rights and fundamental principles found in the United States' legal system as outlined by the text. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted two of the sources of rights and fundamental principles found in the United States' legal system as outlined by the text.	Insufficiently compared and contrasted two of the sources of rights and fundamental principles found in the United States' legal system as outlined by the text.	Partially compared and contrasted two of the sources of rights and fundamental principles found in the United States' legal system as outlined by the text.	Satisfactorily compared and contrasted two of the sources of rights and fundamental principles found in the United States' legal system as outlined by the text.	Thoroughly compared and contrasted two of the sources of rights and fundamental principles found in the United States' legal system as outlined by the text.
2. Critically analyze and discuss three steps of the criminal justice process from arrest to imprisonment. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely critically analyzed and discussed three steps of the criminal justice process from arrest to imprisonment.	Insufficiently critically analyzed and discussed three steps of the criminal justice process from arrest to imprisonment.	Partially critically analyzed and discussed three steps of the criminal justice process from arrest to imprisonment.	Satisfactorily critically analyzed and discussed three steps of the criminal justice process from arrest to imprisonment.	Thoroughly critically analyzed and discussed three steps of the criminal justice process from arrest to imprisonment.
3. Identify and discuss the particular amendment related to arrest, search, and seizures. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed the particular amendment related to arrest, search, and seizures.	Insufficiently identified and discussed the particular amendment related to arrest, search, and seizures.	Partially identified and discussed the particular amendment related to arrest, search, and seizures.	Satisfactorily identified and discussed the particular amendment related to arrest, search, and seizures.	Thoroughly identified and discussed the particular amendment related to arrest, search, and seizures.
4. Compare and contrast the concepts of probable cause and reasonable suspicion. In your own words, explain how they are similar or different. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the concepts of probable cause and reasonable suspicion. Did not submit or incompletely explained how they are similar or different.	Insufficiently compared and contrasted the concepts of probable cause and reasonable suspicion. Insufficiently explained how they are similar or different.	Partially compared and contrasted the concepts of probable cause and reasonable suspicion. Partially explained how they are similar or different.	Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the concepts of probable cause and reasonable suspicion. Satisfactorily explained how they are similar or different.	Thoroughly compared and contrasted the concepts of probable cause and reasonable suspicion. Thoroughly explained how they are similar or different.
5. Examine and discuss the two examples in which the exclusionary rule may not apply. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely examined and discussed the two examples in which the exclusionary rule may not apply.	Insufficiently examined and discussed the two examples in which the exclusionary rule may not apply.	Partially examined and discussed the two examples in which the exclusionary rule may not apply.	Satisfactorily examined and discussed the two examples in which the exclusionary rule may not apply.	Thoroughly examined and discussed the two examples in which the exclusionary rule may not apply.
6. Identify and discuss one contemporary issue or case law related to the use of force from within the last three years. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed one contemporary issue or case law related to the use of force from within the last three years.	Insufficiently identified and discussed one contemporary issue or case law related to the use of force from within the last three years.	Partially identified and discussed one contemporary issue or case law related to the use of force from within the last three years.	Satisfactorily identified and discussed one contemporary issue or case law related to the use of force from within the last three years.	Thoroughly identified and discussed one contemporary issue or case law related to the use of force from within the last three years.
7. Cite 4 references. Weight: 5%	No references provided.	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present.	7-8 errors present.	5-6 errors present.	3-4 errors present.	0-2 errors present.