I know it may seem like we have rehashed much of the first half of US History, but stick with me! There is method to my madness... =) Please take a look at this writing assignment. All of the instr
Written Exam #1 “Its easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled.” -Mark TwainI decided to use this quote to start off this paper for two reasons. Number one I think it perfectly
pertains to what we have been learning over these last few assignments. Number two, because this
quote cannot be found in any book or article associated with Mark Twain. Yet this so called Internet
“meme” has been circulating through many social network sites for some time now, with no
confirmation that t he quote is actually from Mark Twain. I think that it just goes to show how easily we
are fooled and how easily history can be skewed. While many people take this quote at face value as
coming from Mark Twain, some who actually are great fans of his work q uickly point out that, though
it’s a great quote, it cannot be attributed to Mark Twain because in anything they have ever read, never
have they heard this quote before. I myself spent about a half hour trying to find the source of this
quote to no avail. Then I had to laugh to myself in the realization that I had become the butt of this joke.
I myself was easier fooled than convinced that I had been fooled by it. So I thought that perfectly
pertained to the essence of what we discussed in this class.
While it’s important for us as a society to study and learn from history, it’s even more important to
confirm our sources of information and its accuracy. What I have loved most about what Zinn and
Loewen have done is the way they have presented history how we have learned it, then provided the
other side to it. Whether you call these corrections or contradictions, I appreciated a fresh perspective
and new opposing information. The quotes “History is written by the conquerors” and “Who controls
the present, cont rols the past” are both very relevant and accurate. We should take heed of this saying,
because as I have learned in this class so far, what we learn from history, even from “reputable sources”,
is very often a distortion of the truth if not an outright li e. As Loewen says, “Textbooks are often
muddled by the conflicting desires to promote inquiry and to indoctrinate blind patriotism” (Loewen 6).
If you expect to learn anything from history, or claim yourself to be a lover of history, you must be open
to le arning multiple tellings of these historical stories from multiple perspectives. I believe only then can
you start to uncover the truth that makes sense to you. Like finding pieces of a puzzle that fit together,
once you find two its much easier to find th ree because the bigger picture starts to present itself. You
must take in and process each piece of information and compare and contrast them from what you have
previously understood. Again I refer to Loewen who says, “[History] textbooks also keep student s in the
dark about the nature of history. History is a furious debate informed by evidence and reason ” (Loewen
7). As W.E.B. DuBois suggests, “When we skip over the bad parts, our histories begin to lose their value
as ‘incentive and example’.” Both Loewen and Zinn take an unflinching and unfiltered look at American
History and the birth of our nation. From Columbus to the Revolution, the perspective they provide is a
refreshing look at our nation’s past. The damage done by our current and recent past history textbooks
is immense and colors our outlook so much that at times it is hard to stomach some of what Zinn and
Loewen are saying. At times want to dismiss it, but sources they cite for the most part, cannot not be
argued. As I continued on with o ur reading assignments again and again my jaw dropped; yet everything
made sense in connection to those events and the current state of affairs of the world in which we live. I
cannot express my anger and disgust at the outright lies I have been led to bel ieve as a child and young
adult. I felt in some ways violated and used, having been indoctrinated to feel so much pride in our
country, when in fact there is so much of which we should be ashamed. Even as someone who loves history and considers it one my m ost favorite subjects, I felt that I had been mentally crippled from
thinking critically about our nation’s history.
I can’t think of anyone who can’t recite from memory the story of Columbus and the origin story of the
Pilgrims. However, to learn the hist ory from the other side, from the perspective of the natives of the
Americas, and even to hear some of Columbus’ own quotes about the prostitution of young gir ls, is
really hard to process. It seems that there was little honor in the life of Columbus, and as Howard Zinn
points out, the choice of history textbook authors to “emphasize the heroism of Columbus and his
successors as navigators and discoverers, and to deemphasize their genocide, is not a technical necessity
but an ideological choice” (Zinn 9). T his is entirely inexcusable for those who call themselves educators.
We are misled to believe that English Puritan settlers discovered this land we now call America. It’s a
story filled with nationalistic pride that we learn on our first Thanksgiving and r etell every Thanksgiving
after that, but as I learned through the reading materials in this class, nothing could be farther from the
truth than what we have been told. Loewen points out that “More than any other celebration, more
even that such overly patr iotic holidays as Independence Day and Memorial Day, Thanksgiving
celebrates our ethnocentrism” (Loewen 88). The term ethnocentrism is a new term to me, learned in my
recent reading assignments. But both Loewen and Zinn make a compelling case, chalk full o f irrefutable
evidence, of it especially in the origin myth used to detail the landing of our ancestors on the shores of
this country. The Americas at that time were described to us as untamed wilderness, when the reality is
that these lands were already s ettled and inhabited by tribes of Native Americans and had been so for
centuries if not more than a millennium.
We are taught that the natives were a simplistic primitive people; when in fact, they were just as
developed as Europeans, and the early settler s learned much from them. Even the concept of
democracy came from the Iroquois. Yet our textbooks, our teachers, and even our parents neglect to tell
us these things. Maybe our of ignorance or maybe intentionally. However collectively as a country we
negle ct to give credit where credit is due, instead opting to further our ethnocentrism by insisting that it
was the Europeans who brought with them the ideas and concepts of civilized society. However, as
Loewen points out, “Thoughtless use of the terms civili zed and civilization blocks real inquiry into the
worldview or the social structure of the so called uncivilized person or society.” (Loewen 100) The
misuse of history, or as Loewen says “using history as a weapon,” has incredibly long lasting effects on
our society. What do people do when they hear the truth about our country’s founding? They come to
one of two conclusions: they either dismiss these facts and accuse those who reveal them as unpatriotic
further proving the point that we have been blindly in doctrinated into nationalism, or they make the
choice to accept these new facts, and in some respects feel shame for the atrocities committed by our
ancestors in the name of progress. It’s arguable that by choosing the latter, it makes it hard to enjoy the
freedoms that we as Americans have in being the richest, most powerful country on the planet.
Nevertheless, at some point we must all reflect on these facts regardless of how they make us feel.
I’d like to finish by quoting one of the most profound things I read in Howard Zinn’s book: “My point is that we must not, in telling history, accuse, judge, condemn Columbus in absentia. It is too
late for that; it would be a useless s cholarly exercise in morality. But the easy acceptance of atrocities as
a deplora ble but necessary price to pay for p rogress -that is still with us. One reason these atrocities are
still with us is that we have learned to bury them in a mass of other facts, as radioactive wastes are
buried in containers in the earth.” (Zinn 8)
I think that is a statement that applies not only to Columbus but to all of history. As Loewen writes, “The
antidote to feel -good history is not feel -bad history but honest and inclusive history”(Loewen 92). In
order for us to progress and move forward as a societ y, we must accept these ugly truths of our past.
Only then can we understand what it means to progress and grow as a civilized society. Until we
understand that, we are doomed to a feedback loop of the past forever repeating the mistakes of our
ancestors.