In need of help with this assignment. Instructions: You will integrate theory with an overall proposal for a group. You will prepare a proposal This proposal will be approximately 10-12 pages. Please

Group problem

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

Potential problem for group explained with details; specialization area aligned with potential problem.

Points Range:8 (4.00%) - 8 (4.00%)

Potential problem for group explained with few details; specialization area aligned with potential problem.

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 7 (3.50%)

Little discussion of potential problem.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 6 (3.00%)

Lack of discussion and not areas aligned.

Group Rationale

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

Rationale was given with clarity for conducting this type of group/topic.

Points Range:8 (4.00%) - 8 (4.00%)

Rationale was given but was not clear.

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 7 (3.50%)

Rationale was vague.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 6 (3.00%)

Lack of rationale.

Literature Review

Points Range:45 (22.50%) - 50 (25.00%)

Literature review comprised five journal article references; one relevant website. Literature review provides a clear rationale and understanding of the group being proposed. Information is clearly presented.

Points Range:40 (20.00%) - 44 (22.00%)

Literature review comprised four journal article references; one relevant website. Literature review provides a rationale and shows some understanding of the group being proposed. Depth is lacking in review

Points Range:35 (17.50%) - 39 (19.50%)

Literature review comprised 3 journal article references; and no website. Literature review provides an unclear rationale or lack of understanding of the group being proposed.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 34 (17.00%)

Literature review was poorly constructed and lacked citations.

Group Sessions

Points Range:27 (13.50%) - 30 (15.00%)

A minimum of six group meetings were listed with content of sessions with 1 to 2 specific details per session. Sessions are relevant to the type of group being proposed. Sessions link well from week to week.

Points Range:24 (12.00%) - 26 (13.00%)

A minimum of six group meetings were listed with content of sessions with few or weak specific details per session. Sessions are relevant to the type of group being proposed but lacked a common thread.

Points Range:21 (10.50%) - 23 (11.50%)

Less than six meetings were discussed and lacked a common thread.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 20 (10.00%)

Meetings were vague and lacked a common thread or were not discussed at all.

Group Duration

Points Range:4 (2.00%) - 5 (2.50%)

Duration of group included a clear rationale.

Points Range:3 (1.50%) - 3 (1.50%)

Duration was presented and group rationale was presented without clarity.

Points Range:2 (1.00%) - 2 (1.00%)

Duration was presented and group rationale was presented without clarity.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 1 (0.50%)

No duration and no group rationale was presented.

Group Participants

Points Range:4 (2.00%) - 5 (2.50%)

Number of participants presented with screening discussion of all seven items: rationale for: gender, cognitive ability, maturity, duration of issue, frequency of issue, intensity of issue, acceptance and/or completion of issue.

Points Range:3 (1.50%) - 3 (1.50%)

Number of participants presented with screening discussion of five or six items.

Points Range:2 (1.00%) - 2 (1.00%)

Number of participants presented with screening discussion of all three or four items.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 1 (0.50%)

Number of participants presented with screening discussion missing or vague.

Group changes

Points Range:4 (2.00%) - 5 (2.50%)

Anticipated changes were explained with clarity and detail.

Points Range:3 (1.50%) - 3 (1.50%)

Anticipated changes were discussed only briefly.

Points Range:2 (1.00%) - 2 (1.00%)

Anticipated changes were not clear.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 1 (0.50%)

Did not discuss anticipated changes.

Group obstacles

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

Potential obstacles were explained with details.

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 8 (4.00%)

Potential obstacles were explained briefly.

Points Range:5 (2.50%) - 6 (3.00%)

Vague explanation of obstacles.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 4 (2.00%)

Did not discuss obstacles.

Goals

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

Both potential individual goals and group goals were thoroughly developed with details.

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 8 (4.00%)

Both potential individual goals and group goals were discussed but lacked clarity.

Points Range:5 (2.50%) - 6 (3.00%)

Only one type of goal discussed.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 4 (2.00%)

Goals were not discussed.

Theoretical Orientation

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

Theoretical orientation and personal leadership qualities included a discussion of strength and weaknesses.

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 8 (4.00%)

Theoretical orientation and personal leadership qualities included little discussion of strength and weaknesses.

Points Range:5 (2.50%) - 6 (3.00%)

Theoretical orientation and personal leadership qualities included no discussion of strength and weaknesses.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 4 (2.00%)

No or little discussion of theory.

Leadership style

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

Leadership (single or co) was discussed with rationale.

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 8 (4.00%)

Leadership (single or co) was discussed with little rationale.

Points Range:5 (2.50%) - 6 (3.00%)

Leadership (single or co) was discussed with no rationale.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 4 (2.00%)

No or little discussion of leadership.

Evaluation

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

Evaluation was discussed with detailed explanation.

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 8 (4.00%)

Evaluation was discussed with little explanation.

Points Range:5 (2.50%) - 6 (3.00%)

Evaluation was discussed with no explanation.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 4 (2.00%)

No discussion of evaluation.

Flyer

Points Range:10 (5.00%) - 15 (7.50%)

Flyer was attached to report and included all of the following: Title of group, purpose, meeting times and place, contact information with creativity and use of graphics.

Points Range:6 (3.00%) - 9 (4.50%)

Flyer is presented with less than all criteria but is creative and uses graphics.

Points Range:4 (2.00%) - 5 (2.50%)

Flyer is presented with less than all criteria.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 3 (1.50%)

Flyer is presented with less than all criteria and is not creative and does not use graphics.

Mechanics

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

Points Range:8 (4.00%) - 8 (4.00%)

Almost no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation error.

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 7 (3.50%)

Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 6 (3.00%)

Numerous grammatical and punctuation errors.

APA

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

All sources are accurately documented in APA format.

Points Range:8 (4.00%) - 8 (4.00%)

All sources are accurately documented, but a few are not in APA format.

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 7 (3.50%)

Some sources are not accurately documented.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 6 (3.00%)

Numerous sources are not documented accurately and there is not a format used.