The example is attached this is the example given by the professo. please help thanks How to write an analysis. If you read the rubric and the example I posted, as well as the article the student use

Student Name Date BBC (Media Outlet) Author (if known) “Travis Reinking: How did Waffle House suspect get guns after ban? http://www.bbc.com/news/world -us -canada -43868840 Course Name Professor’s Name (OVERVIEW ) “Recently the United States has had yet another mass shooting. This time, however, it was not in a school or a church; it was a mundane restaurant. This mass shooting occurred in a Waffle House in Tennesse e. This mass shooter, like most of the recent mass shooters, has had a history of mental illness. (BACKGROUND ) Travis Reinking has done some things that are very indicative of mental instability. He breached and trespassed upon the White House grounds and demanded to meet with President Trump; he believes that Taylor Swift is stalking him and when she told him to meet her at Dairy Queen by his house, but when he showed up he ran away from her because she was scared; and he once dove into a public pool wear ing a pink dress and flashing the lifeguards. After he was charged with trespassing on the grounds of the White House his legally - owned and licensed guns were taken away and he lost his license to own those guns. This includes the gun he used to kill four innocent people at that Waffle House. (POSITION ) After his license to own an AR -15 (a gun that has been commonly used in mass shooting) was revoked, he was somehow given his license and gun back; even though he was clearly not fit to own that gun. How an yone with a history of mental illness or a through arrest record -like the one that Reinking possesses -could possibly be allowed to own and purchase a firearm, let alone an assault rifle capable of firing multiple rounds per minute, is beyond logical reason ing. This should not be allowed to happen anymore. (POSITION ) Anti -gun protesters do not want a repeal of the Second Amendment or the government to come and steal the guns away from helpless citizens like the NRA and the Far - Right likes to say. They simpl y want people like Reinking to not have the capability to own weapons and for weapons with the capability to kill multiple people very quickly, from afar, and with little effort to be kept out of the hands of ordinary citizens. No person logically needs an assault rifle, a pistol, shotgun, or hunting rifle would easily suffice for hunting and self -defense that people desire firearms for. The fact that this very simple legislation and desires of safety have not been fulfilled yet boils down to two words: pol itical parties. (GOVERNMENT CONNECTION ) Political parties are a logical step and mechanism of politics, people will group together along cultural and economic ideological lines and thus vote similarly. However, these political parties do not have to be so divided, corrupted, and uncooperative. They can very easily work together to get things done, and they have in the past.

They came together after 9/11 to pass instrumental national safety legislation. They came together in the era of civil rights to pass legislation to protect minorities. Currently though, it seems that they will never come together. (CONCLUSION ) Now more than ever, America is deeply divided. The left and the right are so far apart from each other ideologically, they might as well be separate countries. Often, they will disagree on a simple topic, like background checks and mental health tests being required to own a firearm, just to undermine the other party. This is the very reason that George Washington did not want political partie s in America, he wanted to prevent warring factions from hindering logical progress and legislation. As the great Abraham Lincoln once said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” The political parties of today, have created a house that is indeed divided against itself.”