Hi please i need support to create my project for Advanced Database Technologies please see the attached files
Computer and Information System Coursework Assessment201920
Course | CIB3403- Advanced Database Technology | ||
Assessment Method | Group Project | ||
Date of Assessment | Week 14 | Duration / Deadline(s) | |
Maximum Mark | 100 | Percentage of Final Grade | 25% |
Instructions to Students
This is an open book assessment.
This exam paper has 3 pages including the cover page.
Answer ALL questions.
Student HCT ID | Student Name | Signature |
GROUP PROJECT RUBRIC
CLO3: Analyze current and emerging database technologies used in information storage, retrieval and analysis. | ||||
Criteria | Max Marks | Below Expectations [Weight *] | Meets Expectations [Weight *] | Exceeds Expectations [Weight *] |
a. Analyze DM, TM, and WM results using RapidMiner | 6 | [3 points] The student was unable to properly solve the data mining problem and use RapidMiner | [5 points] The student was able to define the DM problem without finding the solution using RapidMiner. | [6 points] The student showed a full mastery of DM problem definition and solving using RapidMiner. |
b. Experiment the start schema for the design and development of data warehousing using Advanced SQL Queries to extract data | 6 | [3 points] The student did not design the correct star schema of the data warehouse and didn’t find the correct SQL queries | [5 points] The student was able to design the start schema of the data warehouse however the SQL queries are not all correct | [6 points] The student have proposed a full correct start schema and implemented the required SQL queries |
Subtotal | 12 | |||
CLO4: Demonstrate the impact of enterprise data analytic tools on organizational performance. | ||||
a. Describe Decision Support System Concepts & Technologies, and types | 8 | [4 points] The student did not correctly describe DSS facets (concepts, technologies, and types) | [6 points] The student was able to correctly describe some DSS facets (concepts, technologies, and types) | [8 points] The student described fully and correctly all the DSS facets (concepts, technologies, and types) |
b. Apply What if analysis, Goal seeking, and Pivot Tables to real cases. | 20 | [10 points] The student wasn’t successful in | [17 points] The student was able to successfully | [20 points] The student showed a full mastery |
applying any of the scenario management techniques nor Pivot Tables on the proposed case | apply some scenario management techniques or Pivot Tables on the proposed case | of applying all scenario management techniques and Pivot Tables on the proposed case | ||
c. Construct a dashboard for a business performance management system using Tableau | 10 | [5 points] The student did not properly use Tableau to construct the dashboard of the proposed case. | [8 points] The student showed a partial understanding and usage of Tableau to construct the dashboard of the proposed case. | [10 points] The student showed a full understanding and usage of Tableau to construct the dashboard of the proposed case. |
Subtotal | 38 | |||
Project Group Mark | 50 |
INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION / DEFENSE
Criteria | Max Marks | Below Expectations [Weight *] | Meets Expectations [Weight *] | Exceeds Expectations [Weight *] |
CLO3: Analyze current and emerging database technologies used in information storage, retrieval and analysis.
Sample of questions during viva:
| 12 | [6 points] Explanation and reasoning is wholly lacking, unable to verify contribution to the task assigned or demonstrate a total misunderstanding of the assignment task. | [10 points] Explanation and reasoning related to task conducted and teamwork contribution is reasonable or logically placed with evident of key points but significantly lacking in support. | [12 points] All explanation and reasoning related to the task conducted and teamwork contribution is above standard with most main points are backed-up with sufficient supporting evidence and examples as required. |
CLO4: Demonstrate the impact of enterprise data analytic tools on organizational performance.
Sample of questions during viva:
| 38 | [19 points] Clear relying of the student on other group members. All the answers are vague and ambiguous. The student was unable to situate his contribution to the whole project. | [31 points] The student was able to situate his contribution to the whole project. Some answers are vague and ambiguous. | [38 points] The student justified a clear and valuable contribution to the group. He showed full respect to his teammates and full mastery of technical and nontechnical requirements of the project. |
Subtotal | 38 | | | |
Project Group Mark | 50 | | | |
FINAL GRADE PROJECT SCORE:
STUDENT 1 | STUDENT 2 | STUDENT 3 | STUDENT 4 | |
Total Group Project Score: | ||||
Total Individual Oral VIVA / Oral Defense: | ||||
Final Score |
C I S 2 0 1 9 2 0 C I B 3 4 0 3 G r o u p P r o j e c t V 3
P a g e 1 | 3