Describe the role government should play in correcting for market failures. Make sure to apply Saint Leo’s Core Values to your analysis, remembering that responsible stewardship calls on us to be ‘res

ECO 20 2 – Written Assignment Scoring Rubric Complete the assignment with attention to the following criteria: Rating Scale Exemplary: Corresponds to an A - to A (90-100%) Proficient: Corresponds to B - to B+ (80 -89%) Basic: Corresponds to C - to C+ (70 -79%) Novice: Corresponds to D to D+ (6 0-69%) Not Attempted: Corresponds to an F (0 -59%) Elements Criteria Not Attempted (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) Novice (does not meet expectations; performance is substandard) Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) Length Requirements 20% There was little or no evidence of an essay 0-11 Points The paper is entirely too short. 12 -13 Points The paper contains a great deal of “fluff” and still doesn’t meet the length requirements 14 -15 Points The paper is just a little on the short side and/or it meets the requirements only because it contains “fluff” that could use trimming. 16 -17 Points The paper falls within the required length requirements without going over and without straying from the main topic(s). 18 -20 Points Mechanics of Writing 30% Little to no evidence of proper writing mechanics 0-17 Points The grammar of the paper greatly impedes understanding of content; and/or the paper contains no citations. 18 -20 Points The paper needs a good deal of improvement with respect to grammar, citations, spelling, and/or style. 21 -23 Points The paper is mostly free of errors with respect to grammar, citations, spelling, and/or style, but needs some improvement in this area. 24 -26 Points The paper is nearly perfect with respect to grammar, citations, spelling, and style. 27 -30 Points Understanding & Application 50% The paper exhibits a complete lack of understanding of the text and/or course materials, and the application was incorrect. 0-29 Points The paper exhibits very little understanding of the text and/or course materials, and the application was vague. 30 -34 Points The paper exhibits basic understanding of the text and/or course materials, but needs improvement in this area. The application was superficial and did no t go in depth. 35 -39 Points The paper exhibits sufficient understanding of the text and/or course materials, but some improvement needed. The application was detailed and shows a developing level of understanding. 40 -44 Points The paper does an excel lent job demonstrating an accurate understanding of the text and/or course materials. The application showed a higher level of analysis 45 -50 Points