The assignment is a written essay, Harvard style (including cover, table of content, introduction...) with approx 1.500 words, based in the idea of introducing the company FARINERA COROMINA to 2 diffe
International Entrepreneurship 6GN502
CW2 – Critical Evaluation & Reflection Template
| Student No.: |
Critical Evaluation
Select and critically evaluate one model, framework or theory which you have used in CW1.
You will need to include robust, academic references to support your critical evaluation and demonstrate academic underpinning (eg academic journal articles, textbooks). Ideally, these sources should not be journalistic or web based, and should be presented using Harvard referencing.
Use the template below and approx. 750 words.
| Model, Framework or Theory to be critically evaluated: |
| Diagram of Model, Framework or Theory (if appropriate): |
| Critical Evaluation: (Approx. 750 words) |
| References: |
[This part of report worth 20%]
Reflection
Reflect on the following question:
How has the formative feedback you have received during the module influenced your approach to learning and how has that feedback helped you (or not) to apply your international entrepreneurship models, frameworks and/or theories?
You will need to include robust, academic references to support your reflections and demonstrate academic underpinning (eg academic journal articles, textbooks). Ideally, these sources should not be journalistic or web based, and should be presented using Harvard referencing.
Use the template below and approx. 750 words.
(NB: It is recommended that the 750 words are split relatively evenly across the What, So What and Now What sections).
| What? Go back over your formative feedback, approaches to learning and international entrepreneurship experience during the module (positive and/or negative), select areas to focus on and identify what happened. What academic content underpins your description? This is the descriptive foundation of your reflection and is a divergent approach to generate ideas, detail content and reconstruct events. |
| (Approx. 250 words) |
| So What? Describing your experience is not enough – you need to analyse things in detail from different angles to try and make sense of your experience and work out why this is significant. What have you learnt at a deeper level? What do you now understand about yourself in relation to the issue? How does your experience relate to theory? What does the formative feedback received mean for your approach to learning and the application of your international entrepreneurship models, frameworks and/or theories? This is a convergent approach to analyse your experience from a variety of perspectives. |
| (Approx. 250 words) |
| Now What? Now that you have a better understanding of your experience, what will you do with the insights gained into formative feedback, your approach to learning and the application of your international entrepreneurship models, frameworks and/or theories? How will you be different? Or do things differently? What worked well that you could use again or adapt in the future? What should you avoid and why? Distil the most relevant lessons and determine how and where they can be applied. |
| (Approx. 250 words) |
| References: |
[This part of report worth 20%]
Reflection on Engagement
Please confirm the number of sessions attended between weeks 3 and 11 (max.18). Explain and reflect on any absences.
| No of sessions attended between weeks 3 and 11 (max 18) | |
| Explanation of and reflection on any absences: (Max. 100 words) | |
[This part of report worth 10%]
