CAN YOU DO THIS FOR ME...DUE 5/14/2020 Use proper etiquette in discussion. Quality as well as quantity counts. Present your own opinion on the assigned topic in a 300–500-word thread. Provide at least

Discussion Board Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

(70%)

Advanced

90-100%

Proficient

70-89%

Developing

1-69%

Not Present

Total

Initial Post: Content

36 to 40 points:

Each question/prompt is answered thoroughly and logically.
Major points are stated clearly and effectively.
Clear, logical flow to post; stayed on topic.
Personal examples are used appropriately

28 to 35.5 points:

Most questions/prompts are answered.
Major points are stated clearly and effectively for the most part.
Post is clear, logical and focused for the most part.
Personal examples are overused.

1 to 27.5 points:

Most prompts/ questions are answered.
Lack of clarity, coherence, logic and focus in key areas.
Personal examples are over-relied upon.

0 points

Not Present

Initial Post: Research Engagement

15.5 to 17.5 points:

Ideas from the reading and presentations from the Module/Week are integrated.
One (1) “outside” (not from class) scripture is incorporated into the post.
One (1) “outside” (not from the text or class) “scholarly” reference (Journal or Law Review) is incorporated into the post.

12.5 to 15 points:

Some ideas from the reading and presentations from the Module/Week are incorporated.
Scripture is used but not incorporated.
Scripture is not “quoted” for context.
Reference is used but not scholarly.
Reference is not incorporated.

1 to 12 points:

Readings and presentations from the Module/Week are not incorporated.
No “outside” scripture incorporated.
No “outside” reference incorporated.

0 points

Not Present

Replies: Content

27 to 30 points:

One reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads.
It’s clear what the other student’s said.
There was a detailed “analysis” of the other student’s reasoning.
In addition to analysis, the post moves the other student’s post forward, with new ideas, questions, and research.
One (1) “outside” (not from the text or class) “scholarly” reference (Journal or Law Review) is incorporated into the post.

21 to 26.5 points:

One reply posted to each of 2 classmates’ threads.
It’s not clear what the other student said.
No “analysis” of the other student’s reasoning
New ideas, research, questions, and analysis are not included.
Reply posts do not seem to actually forward the classmate’s post.
Agreement or disagreement with some reasoning
Reference is used but not scholarly.

1 to 20.5 points:

Missing one reply post.
No analysis
It’s completely unclear what the other student said.

Post is an opinion reply only
Mere agreement or disagreement only
Reply post only asks questions
No “outside” reference incorporated.

0 points

Not Present

Structure (30%)

Advanced

90-100%

Proficient

70-89%

Developing

1-69%

Not Present

Total

Grammar, Spelling & APA: Initial Post

18 to 20 points:

Minimal to no errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format.

14 to 17.5 points:

Some errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format.

1 to 13.5 points:

Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format.

0 points

Not Present

Word Count

Initial Post

6.75 to 7.5 points:

150–250 words per reply.

5.25 to 6.5 points:

80%-50% words less than the required length.

1 to 5 points:

49%-1% words less than the required length.

0 points

Not Present

Grammar, Spelling & APA: Replies

9 to 10 points:

Minimal to no errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format.

7 to 8.5 points

Some errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format.

1 to 6.5 points:

Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and APA format.

0 points

Not Present

Professor Comments:

Total:

/125