The topic of this research is increasing on-task behavior during distance learning time in gifted students diagnosed with ADHD at elementary level. We want to find strategies and behavioral interventi
RSHUM 806
Literature Review Grading Rubric
Student:
Criteria | 10 points | 8 points | 6 points | 4 points | 0 points | Points Earned |
Abstract | The abstract is a brief, focused description of the contents of the paper | Generally focused on the contents of the paper | Somewhat focused on a broad topic | Scattered, random writing without focus | N/A | |
Introduction | Clearly and concisely articulates the topic of study, states the research question(s) motivating the investigation, and discusses the theoretical/conceptual framework and historical background for the study | Discusses the topic of study, the research question(s), and the theoretical/ conceptual framework or historical background for the study | The topic of study and research question(s) are unclear. The framework and background for the study are vague | Unfocused and wandering discussion; missing multiple required elements | N/A | |
Discussion of Key Terms | Keywords and essential terms are clearly discussed and defined using direct support from authoritative sources on the topic; includes citations | Keywords and essential terms are clearly discussed and defined | Definitions of keywords and essential terms are ambiguous or vague | Missing multiple required elements | N/A | |
40 points | 30 points | 20 points | 10 points | 0 points | ||
Review of the Literature | Relevant research findings are tightly synthesized and organized by themes/categories; uses a balanced amount of direct quotation; includes citations to support findings | Research findings are organized by themes/categories; uses direct quotations and includes citations to support findings | Research findings are summarized by study, rather than synthesized by themes/categories; direct quotations are used either too heavily or too sparingly | Fails to include relevant research or includes findings unrelated to the topic; sources of argumentation and support unclear | N/A | |
| 10 points | 8 points | 6 points | 4 points | 0 points | |
Summary/ Conclusion | Includes a focused summary of key findings from the review; gaps in the literature and recommendations for future research are clearly discussed | Includes a summary of key findings from the review; gaps in the literature and recommendations for future research are identified | Summary of key findings is unfocused or inconsistent with the review; gaps in the literature or recommendations for future research are vague | Unfocused and wandering summary; missing multiple required elements | N/A | |
Grammar, Usage, & Mechanics | 0–2 errors | 3–4 errors | 5 errors | 6–8 errors | More than 8 errors | |
APA Format | 0–2 APA errors | 3–5 APA errors | 6–7 APA errors | 8–9 APA errors | More than 10 APA errors | |
Total: | ||||||
Instructor Comments: |