Ethical Dilemma BriefIntroductionHealth care administrators are confronted with ethical dilemmas and difficult decision making during their work. As we have already discovered, there are important int
Name: w08a1
Description: w08a1 - Ethical Dilemma Brief Scoring Guide
Grid View
List View
Unacceptable Needs Improvement Competent Exemplary
Prepare a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Does not prepare a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma.
Points:
11.025 (10.50%)
Prepares a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma. Work is adequate but missing significant details.
Points:
12.495 (11.90%)
Prepares a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma.
Points:
14.7 (14.00%)
Prepares a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma. Work is authentic and fully supported by research.
Apply ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Does not apply ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers.
Points:
11.025 (10.50%)
Applies ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers, but work is superficial and lacks thoroughness.
Points:
12.495 (11.90%)
Applies ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers.
Points:
14.7 (14.00%)
Applies ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers. Work is scholarly and fully supported by relevant research and examples.
Outline the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Does not outline the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma.
Points:
11.025 (10.50%)
Outlines the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma, but work is missing key information or lacks substance.
Points:
12.495 (11.90%)
Outlines the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma.
Points:
14.7 (14.00%)
Outlines the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma. Work is accurate and well- supported by credible evidence.
Propose a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Does not propose a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma.
Points:
11.025 (10.50%)
Proposes a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma, but recommendations are flawed or not clearly defined.
Points:
12.495 (11.90%)
Proposes a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma.
Points:
14.7 (14.00%)
Proposes a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma. Recommendations are well thought out and fully support the solution.
Defend the solution from an ethical standpoint.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Does not defend the solution from an ethical standpoint.
Points:
11.025 (10.50%)
Defends the solution from an ethical standpoint, but analysis lacks depth or overlooks key considerations.
Points:
12.495 (11.90%)
Defends the solution from an ethical standpoint.
Points:
14.7 (14.00%)
Defends the solution from an ethical standpoint and makes logically sound inferences based on current research.
Use at least three peer-reviewed articles less than five years old.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Does not use at least three peer-reviewed articles less than five years old.
Points:
7.875 (7.50%)
Use at least three peer-reviewed articles less than five years old, but references are dated or of poor quality.
Points:
8.925 (8.50%)
Uses at least three peer-reviewed articles less than five years old.
Points:
10.5 (10.00%)
Use at least three quality academic resources; references are high quality and references are error free.
Provide appropriate in-text citations and reference section.
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Does not provide appropriate in-text citations and reference section.
Points:
7.875 (7.50%)
Provides in-text citations and reference section, but work is of poor quality or contains multiple errors.
Points:
8.925 (8.50%)
Provides appropriate in-text citations and reference section.
Points:
10.5 (10.00%)
Provides appropriate in-text citations and reference section; references are high quality and error free.
New Row8
Points:
0 (0.00%)
Meet clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.
Points:
7.875 (7.50%)
Does not meet clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.
Points:
8.925 (8.50%)
Partially meets clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements with 5–6 errors.
Points:
10.5 (10.00%)
Meets clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements with 3–4 errors. Meets clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements with 0–2 errors.
