I AM ATTACHING PART 1 ALONG WITH THE FEEDBACK AND TEMPLATE NEEDED - DUE IN 36 HOURSWorkshop Plan Part 3Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review theMultigenerational Center Activity(Links to
Only Part 1A and Part 1B were assessed using the Summative Template (refer to the attachment to the Welcome to Week 3 announcement).
Assessment Feedback:
Key Concepts: Highlighted below are specific examples of instructional prompt responses that meet rubric criteria:
CREATIVE title for your workshop-Equitable Learning Opportunities for Children!
You certainly demonstrated KNOWLEDGE of the workshop title in your explanation and objective/purpose!
DEMONSTRATED ELITE knowledge regarding the sociocultural theory!
COLORFUL flyer that will certainly attract an audience!
Revision Needs: Highlighted below are "revision needs"; my strategy to prepare you for your future career by ensuring you understand key parts of our assignment topic-it is NOT a reflection of your effort! Once you make the revisions, I would be HAPPY to reassess your work!
Please refer to the Welcome to Week 3 announcement and open the attachment. I am confident if you read the information "From Instructor Renae", you will understand revision needs.
How will you address your "clients'?
Be sure to include the name of presenter and time on your flyer/Spelling of "how"
Once revisions are complete, resubmit in Waypoint (the new document will appear as a 2nd submission). PLEASE email me at [email protected] that you have resubmitted (otherwise, I will miss your efforts)! I look forward to hearing from you that you made revisions!
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me!
Instructor Renae
( 2.00 / 2.00) Part 1A: Workshop Details, Title, Explanation, and Purpose
Distinguished - Includes the workshop details and title and a thorough explanation of the workshop and its purpose or objective.
Comments:
I am excited to learn more about your workshop. Your title is intriguing, and your explanation is very interesting. I clearly understand the purpose of this workshop, and I cannot wait to attend!
( 3.52 / 4.00) Part 1A: Workshop Details, Description of Target Audience, and Explanation of Theory that Supports Workshop Content
Proficient - Describes the target audience, and explains the theory that supports workshop content. The description or the explanation is slightly underdeveloped.
( 1.52 / 2.00) Part 1B: Workshop Flyer
Basic - The workshop flyer includes at least six of the required items. The flyer is somewhat engaging, and the content is mostly appropriate.
( 0.44 / 0.50) Written Communication: Content Development
Proficient - Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
( 0.50 / 0.50) Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing
Distinguished - Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.
Comments:
Great job! The information you presented is organized and follows a logical sequence. Your effective use of transitional devices provides a sense of coherence in your assignment.
( 0.25 / 0.25) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Comments:
Great work! The grammar, spelling, and punctuation are correct and add to the readability of your paper.
( 0.25 / 0.25) Written Communication: APA Formatting
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
( 0.25 / 0.25) Written Communication: Page Requirement
Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
( 0.25 / 0.25) Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Overall Score: 8.98 / 10.00
Overall Grade: 8.98
