Please use Milestone Three Template provided. Overview: In the final project for this course, you will be tasked with making EHR recommendations for a fictional organization from the provided scenari
HIM 220_Teacher Feedback
Criteria | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | |
Analysis: Organizational Overview: Organization | 9.5 points Describes the organization and potential aspects that will need to be considered when recommending a database
| 7.125 points Describes the organization and potential aspects that will need to be considered when recommending a database, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies | 0 points Does not describe the organization | 9.5 / 9.5 |
Analysis: Organizational Overview: Services | 9.5 points Describes the scope of services the organization provides based on the information provided | 1.25 points Describes the scope of services the organization provides based on the information provided, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies | 0 points Does not describe the scope of services offered by the organization | 9.5 / 9.5 |
Analysis: Organizational Overview: Stakeholders | 9.5 points Determines the key stakeholders that would need to be part of the EHR selection process and provides rationale for each choice | 7.125 points Determines the key stakeholders that would need to be part of the EHR selection process and provides rationale for each choice, but rationale is cursory or illogical | 0 points Does not determine the key stakeholders that would need to be part of the EHR selection process | 9.5 / 9.5 |
Design: Applications: Requirements | 9.5 points Determines the necessary requirements of applications to ensure they adhere to applicable regulations, explaining each requirement | 7.125 points Determines the necessary requirements of applications to ensure they adhere to applicable regulations, explaining each requirement, but explanation is cursory or lacking details | 0 points Does not determine the necessary requirements of applications | 9.5 / 9.5 |
Design: Applications: Scope | 9.5 points Describes the scope of functionality the applications will be depended on for and justifies why the applications are essential to the HER | 7.125 points Describes the scope of functionality the applications will be depended on for and justifies why the applications are essential to the EHR, but description is cursory or illogical or justification is inaccurate | 0 points Does not describe the scope of functionality that the applications will be depended on for | 9.5 / 9.5 |
Design: Applications: Data | 9.5 points Establishes the secondary data the organization will need to be part of the EHR and explains why this data is necessary | 7.125 points Establishes the secondary data the organization will need to be part of the EHR and explains why this data is necessary, but explanation is cursory or inaccurate | 0 points Does not establish the secondary data the organization will need to be a part of the EHR | 7.125 / 9.5 |
Criterion Feedback
More specifics needed regarding the use of secondary data
Design: Applications: Health Information Exchange | 9.5 points Describes how the applications will handle HIE | 7.125 points Describes how the applications will handle HIE, but description is cursory or inaccurate | 0 points Does not describe how the applications will handle HIE | 9.5 / 9.5 |
Design: Applications: Security | 9.5 points Describes the security features within the application and explains how these features will be effective in protecting patient information | 7.125 points Describes the security features within the application and explains how these features will be effective in protecting patient information, but description is cursory or inaccurate or explanation is illogical | 0 points Does not describe the security features within the application |
9.5 / 9.5 |
Design: Applications: Computer-Assisted Coding | 9.5 points Interprets the processes of the computer-assisted coding that will be used in the coding management application | 7.125 points Interprets the processes of the computer-assisted coding that will be used in the coding management application, but interpretation is cursory or inaccurate or explanation is illogical | 0 points Does not interpret the processes of the computer-assisted coding that will be used in the coding management application | 9.5 / 9.5 |
Design: Applications: Capabilities | 9.5 points Explains how the computer-assisted coding capabilities will contribute to the effectiveness of the coding processes and the EHR | 7.125 points Explains how the computer-assisted coding capabilities will contribute to the effectiveness of the coding processes and the EHR, but contains inaccuracies or explanation is illogical | 0 points Does not explain how the computer-assisted coding capabilities will contribute to the effectiveness of the coding processes and the EHR | 9.5 / 9.5 |
Articulation of Response | 5 points Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | 3.75 points Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | 0 points Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 5 / 5 |
Total 97.625 / 100
Proficient Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria. | Needs Improvement Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria. | Not Evident Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria. |