Please use Milestone Three Template provided. Overview: In the final project for this course, you will be tasked with making EHR recommendations for a fictional organization from the provided scenari

HIM 220_Teacher Feedback

Criteria

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Analysis: Organizational Overview: Organization

9.5 points

Describes the organization and potential aspects that will need to be considered when recommending a database

7.125 points

Describes the organization and potential aspects that will need to be considered when recommending a database, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies

0 points

Does not describe the organization

9.5 / 9.5

Analysis: Organizational Overview: Services

9.5 points

Describes the scope of services the organization provides based on the information provided

1.25 points

Describes the scope of services the organization provides based on the information provided, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies

0 points

Does not describe the scope of services offered by the organization

9.5 / 9.5

Analysis: Organizational Overview: Stakeholders

9.5 points

Determines the key stakeholders that would need to be part of the EHR selection process and provides rationale for each choice

7.125 points

Determines the key stakeholders that would need to be part of the EHR selection process and provides rationale for each choice, but rationale is cursory or illogical

0 points

Does not determine the key stakeholders that would need to be part of the EHR selection process

9.5 / 9.5

Design: Applications: Requirements

9.5 points

Determines the necessary requirements of applications to ensure they adhere to applicable regulations, explaining each requirement

7.125 points

Determines the necessary requirements of applications to ensure they adhere to applicable regulations, explaining each requirement, but explanation is cursory or lacking details

0 points

Does not determine the necessary requirements of applications

9.5 / 9.5

Design: Applications: Scope

9.5 points

Describes the scope of functionality the applications will be depended on for and justifies why the applications are essential to the HER

7.125 points

Describes the scope of functionality the applications will be depended on for and justifies why the applications are essential to the EHR, but description is cursory or illogical or justification is inaccurate

0 points

Does not describe the scope of functionality that the applications will be depended on for

9.5 / 9.5

Design: Applications: Data

9.5 points

Establishes the secondary data the organization will need to be part of the EHR and explains why this data is necessary

7.125 points

Establishes the secondary data the organization will need to be part of the EHR and explains why this data is necessary, but explanation is cursory or inaccurate

0 points

Does not establish the secondary data the organization will need to be a part of the EHR

7.125 / 9.5

Criterion Feedback

More specifics needed regarding the use of secondary data

Design: Applications: Health Information Exchange

9.5 points

Describes how the applications will handle HIE

7.125 points

Describes how the applications will handle HIE, but description is cursory or inaccurate

0 points

Does not describe how the applications will handle HIE

9.5 / 9.5

Design: Applications: Security

9.5 points

Describes the security features within the application and explains how these features will be effective in protecting patient information

7.125 points

Describes the security features within the application and explains how these features will be effective in protecting patient information, but description is cursory or inaccurate or explanation is illogical

0 points

Does not describe the security features within the application

9.5 / 9.5

Design: Applications: Computer-Assisted Coding

9.5 points

Interprets the processes of the computer-assisted coding that will be used in the coding management application

7.125 points

Interprets the processes of the computer-assisted coding that will be used in the coding management application, but interpretation is cursory or inaccurate or explanation is illogical

0 points

Does not interpret the processes of the computer-assisted coding that will be used in the coding management application

9.5 / 9.5

Design: Applications: Capabilities

9.5 points

Explains how the computer-assisted coding capabilities will contribute to the effectiveness of the coding processes and the EHR

7.125 points

Explains how the computer-assisted coding capabilities will contribute to the effectiveness of the coding processes and the EHR, but contains inaccuracies or explanation is illogical

0 points

Does not explain how the computer-assisted coding capabilities will contribute to the effectiveness of the coding processes and the EHR

9.5 / 9.5

Articulation of Response

5 points

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

3.75 points

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

0 points

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

5 / 5

Total 97.625 / 100

Proficient

Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.

Needs Improvement

Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.

Not Evident

Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.