Please use Milestone Four Template provided.Overview: This milestone focuses on the topic of this week’s lessons: compensating employees. Using the material on compensation provided in this week’s les
| Critical Elements | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | |
| HRM Functions and Practices: Function | 23 points Meets “Proficient” criteria and explanation is supported with evidence | 19.55 points Explains why the human resource function should be aligned with an organization’s strategic plan | 12.65 points Explains why the human resource function should be aligned with an organization’s strategic plan, but explanation is cursory or inaccurate | 0 points Does not explain why the human resource function should be aligned with an organization’s strategic plan | 19.55 / 23 |
Criterion Feedback
You started out with some great information on why the HR function should be aligned with the organization strategic plan. You need to further expand on this and explain in detail. Use examples from the course material this week as well as the case study on how this has been done. Be sure that fully explain your thoughts here and show the alignment. Consider how you may use an example from the course material to demonstrate this as well. Be sure that you cite your information as well.
| HRM Functions and Practices: Global Conditions | 23 points Meets “Proficient” criteria and explanation is clear and detailed | 19.55 points Explains how current global conditions in the industry impact human resource management practices within organizations | 12.65 points Explains how current global conditions in the industry impact human resource management practices within organizations, but explanation is cursory or has gaps in accuracy | 0 points Does not explain how current global conditions impact human resource management practices within organizations | 23 / 23 |
| Staffing: Recruit | 23 points Meets “Proficient” criteria and description demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the relationship between recruiting and the organization’s vision and goals | 19.55 points Describes a process to recruit and select new employees who are aligned with the organization’s vision and goals | 12.65 points Describes a process to recruit and select new employees who are aligned with the organization’s vision and goals, but description is cursory or inaccurate | 0 points Does not describe a process to recruit and select new employees who are aligned with the organization’s vision and goals | 23 / 23 |
Criterion Feedback:
You did a great job in this area. Be sure that you use the information from the area that you wrote on in the section on candidates to back this up as well as supporting documentation and examples.
| Staffing: Candidates | 23 points Meets “Proficient” criteria and establishes which method would be more beneficial for an organization based on the research | 19.55 points Compares and contrasts recruitment and selection of internal versus external candidates | 12.65 points Compares and contrasts recruitment and selection of internal versus external candidates but comparison lacks detail or contains inaccuracies | 0 points Does not compare and contrast recruitment and selection of internal versus external candidates | 23 / 23 |
| Articulation of Response | 8 points Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format | 6.8 points Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | 4.4 points Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | 0 points Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 8 / 8 |
| Total 96.55 / 100 |
Overall Score
| Exemplary Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria | Proficient Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria. | Needs Improvement Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria. | Not Evident Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria. |
