Due JUNE 07 at 11:59 PM What is the Socratic Method? In a 2-3 page essay, explain the Socratic approach to philosophy and Illustrate your understanding of dialectic with a contemporary example of a b

Rubric Assessment

Top of Form

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6)

6 points

6 %

Satisfactory (C range) (7)

7 points

7 %

Proficient (B range) (8)

8 points

8 %

Exemplary (A range) (9–10)

10 points

10 %

Explained the Socratic Method of Philosophy

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment concepts with some inability to fully articulate them

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply most assignments concepts

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts

/ 10

Criterion score has been overridden

Discussed an illustration of the Socratic Method from the course texts.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Work does not meet assignment expectations; no clear purpose is provided

Assignment meets expectations with minimal depth and breath; the discussion of main ideas is vague

Assignment meets expectations with most components being addressed in good depth and breadth; the main ideas are clearly explained

Assignment meets or exceeds expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breath; a comprehensive account of the main ideas delineates all requirements of the assignment

/ 10

Criterion score has been overridden

Identified a contemporary belief that can be examined Socratically and posed some questions that Socrates might ask regarding the belief.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Work does not meet assignment expectations; no clear purpose is provided

Assignment meets expectations with minimal depth and breath; the discussion of main ideas is vague

Assignment meets expectations with most components being addressed in good depth and breadth; the main ideas are clearly explained

Assignment meets or exceeds expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breath; a comprehensive account of the main ideas delineates all requirements of the assignment

/ 10

Criterion score has been overridden

Substantiated content with the course texts

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Work is not substantiated by sources or sources supplied do not have credibility

Summarizes information gleaned from the course texts to support major points, but does not synthesize; provides minimal justification to support major topics

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from the course texts to support major points presented

/ 10

Criterion score has been overridden

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F through D range) (1–2)

2 points

2 %

Satisfactory (C range) (3)

3 points

3 %

Proficient (B range) (4)

4 points

4 %

Exemplary (A range) (5)

5 points

5 %

Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Errors in basic writing conventions are sufficiently numerous to prevent reader comprehension

Submission contains incoherent or inconsistent presentation of ideas, which prevents understanding the majority of author’s overall intent

The reader can follow the author’s overall intent as stated; there may be errors in basic writing conventions but these do not interfere with reader comprehension

The writer’s overall argument and language are clear and focused, leaving the reader with no confusion about author’s intent; the text is basically error free

/ 5

Criterion score has been overridden

Used APA formatted citations and references, and used correct structural formatting

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

No attempt at Academic/APA formatting

Academic/APA format is attempted but errors are distracting

Using Academic/APA format, accurately; errors are noticeable but minor

Using Academic/APA format proficiently; text is basically error free

/ 5

Criterion score has been overridden

Rubric Total Score Total Total Score

Clear Override

/ 50

Criterion score has been overridden

Overall Score

Overall Score

No Submission0 points minimum

Clear Override

Emerging (F through D range)1 point minimum

Clear Override

Satisfactory (C range)35 points minimum

Clear Override

Proficient (B range)40 points minimum

Clear Override

Exemplary (A range)45 points minimum

Clear Override

Overall Feedback

Bottom of Form