Discussion: Legal and Ethical Considerations for Group and Family Therapy Considering the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), the idea of discussing confidential information w
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NRNP_6650_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
| Outstanding Performance | Excellent Performance | Competent Performance | Proficient Performance | Room for Improvement |
Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. | Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%) • Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) | Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%) • Responds to the discusion question(s) | Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%) • Responds to most of the discusion question(s) | Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%) • Responds to some of the discusion question(s) | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%) • Does not respond to the discusion question(s) |
Main Posting: Writing | Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) • Written clearly and concisely | Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) • Written clearly and concisely | Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) • Written concisely | Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) •Writtten somewhat concisely | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) • Not written clearly or concisely |
Main Posting: Timely and full participation | Points Range: 10 (10%) - 10 (10%) • Meets requirements for timely and full participation | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) • Does not meet requirement for full participation |
First Reponse | Points Range: 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings | Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%) • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings | Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%) • Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting | Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%) • Response is on topic, may have some depth | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) • Reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth |
First Reponse: Writing | Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues | Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues | Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) • Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues | Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) • Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) • Responses posted in the discussion lack effective |
First Reponse: Timely and full participation | Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) • Meets requirements for timely and full participation | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) • Does not meet requirement for full participation |
Second Reponse: Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. | Points Range: 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings | Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%) • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings | Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%) • Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting | Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%) • Response is on topic, may have some depth | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) • Response may not be on topic, lacks depth |
Second Reponse: Writing | Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues | Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues | Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) • Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues | Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) • Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) >• Responses posted in the discussion lack effective |
Second Reponse: Timely and full participation | Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) • Meets requirements for timely and full participation | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) • Does not meet requirement for full participation |
Total Points: 100 |
Name: NRNP_6650_Week1_Discussion_Rubric