Reflection Assignment 4: Meeting Essential VIIIThis week, reflect on your perception of change theory, management roles and nursing leadership, communication conflict, and the nurse management role in

Content

Points Range:35.2 (35.20%) - 40 (40.00%)

The writer clearly and effectively responds to the assignment. The writer thoughtfully and eloquently evaluates his/her effectiveness at meeting the program essential(s), and ponders the future as it relates to this accomplishment. The writer makes clear and meaningful connections between academics and real-world applications. The student is aptly able to describe growth and development in becoming a professional nurse.

Points Range:30.4 (30.40%) - 34.8 (34.80%)

The response to the assignment is generally adequate, but may not be thorough. The writer includes minimal evaluation of his/her effectiveness at meeting the program essential(s), and vaguely ponders the future as it relates to this accomplishment. The writer makes vague or unclear connections between academics and real-world applications on some occasions. The student is able to describe growth and development in becoming a professional nurse, but it may be vague or unclear in places.

Points Range:24 (24.00%) - 30 (30.00%)

An attempt to effectively respond to the assignment is clear; however, the writer digresses or misses several components of the assignment. A reflective evaluation is attempted, but it is unclear or unrelated. Real-world connections may be unrealistic or inaccurate. The student attempts to describe growth and development in becoming a professional nurse, but fails to do so.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 23.6 (23.60%)

The writer does not respond to the assignment topic in any way. No evaluation of the essentials and one’s effectiveness at meeting them is made. No real-world connections are made. The student fails to include growth and development in becoming a professional nurse.

Supporting Evidence and Detail

Points Range:26.4 (26.40%) - 30 (30.00%)

There is one clear, well- focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information. The student showcases relevant assignment(s) and course work that support the essentials and outcomes indicated. The student directly references relevant assignments/ course work in his/her reflection.

Points Range:22.8 (22.80%) - 26.1 (26.10%)

There is one topic, but it may be vague or poorly stated. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by detailed information. The student showcases relevant assignment(s) and course work that support the essentials and outcomes indicated, but there may be no direct connections made within the reflection, or vice versa.

Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 22.5 (22.50%)

An attempt to stay on topic is clear, but there may be several areas of digression. Main ideas are hidden and unclear, and have little or no clear support or detail. Some assignments or course work may be referenced or showcased, but it is not connected to the essentials indicated in the assignment.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 17.7 (17.70%)

The topic and main ideas are unclear or missing. Assignment(s) and course work that support the essentials and outcomes are missing. No reference to the assignments is made.

Organization

Points Range:17.6 (17.60%) - 20 (20.00%)

The introduction is engaging, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong and definitive. Reflection has a logical progression of thought and information.

Points Range:15.2 (15.20%) - 17.4 (17.40%)

The introduction is clear and states the main topic. Most information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is clear but may be generic. Reflection mostly has logical progression of thought and information with minimal lapses.

Points Range:12 (12.00%) - 15 (15.00%)

The introduction states the main topic and provides an overview of the paper. A conclusion is somewhat apparent. Reflection shows an attempt at logical progression of thought and information but includes several inconsistencies.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 11.8 (11.80%)

There is no clear introduction, structure, or conclusion. Reflection has no logical progression of thought and information.

Mechanics and APA style

Points Range:8.8 (8.80%) - 10 (10.00%)

The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citations, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

Points Range:7.6 (7.60%) - 8.7 (8.70%)

The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Almost all sources are cited and referenced correctly.

Points Range:6 (6.00%) - 7.5 (7.50%)

The assignment shows attempts at using current APA format correctly, but many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly. Attempts at proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation are clear, but several errors are present.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 5.9 (5.90%)

The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that interfere with reading. Citations and references are missing.