Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the "Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1" document to organize your essay. Successful completion o

Qualitative Research Critique

Name

University, NRS-433V

Date

Qualitative Research Critique

xx The first paragraph is always the introduction. No heading is needed for the introduction because the first paragraph is presumed to be just that. The introduction should identify the topic and briefly describe why it is important. The introduction concludes with a thesis statement. A thesis statement essentially sets for the reader what to expect in the discussion. The thesis statement is always a required gradable content area so be sure to include it at the end of your introduction. (Ex: This discussion critiques two qualitative studies that support the proposed evidence-based practice initiative.)

Qualitative Studies

xx Offer a brief description of what a qualitative study is and methods of qualitative studies (just identify them, no deep discussion needed). This paragraph indicates what to expect of your selected qualitative studies.

Study 1

xx Identify your first qualitative study by presenting it as a reference in full APA-format (example: Maher, R. L., Hanlon, J. T., & Hajjar, E. R. (2014). Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opinion Drug Safety, 13, 1-7. Retrieved from: …. or doi.). Do not format it as you do in the references (hanging indented); just type it out in paragraph form.

Study 2

xx Same as above

Background

Study 1

xx Discuss background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Provide deep detail here.

Study 2

xx Same

Supportive to PICOT

PICOT

xx State your PICOT here. Notice that below Study 1 and Study 2 are now third levels headings because PICOT is the second level heading. Do not change the formatting.

Study 1. xx Discuss how the article supports your PICOT question. The article demonstrates strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the article strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Address these points in your discussion.

Study 2. xx Same

Study Methodology

Study 1

xx Provide a thorough discussion on the method of study for the article. The comparison of study methods should be described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method should be presented. The discussion should demonstrate a solid understanding of research methods. Much of this information should have been included on your summary table. Remember to identify the type of qualitative study.

Study 2

xx Same

Results

Study 1

xx Discuss the study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice; must be thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Study 2

xx Same

Ethical Considerations

Study 1

xx Discuss ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research; discussion must be thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Was the sample representative of a vulnerable population? Was IRB approval obtained? Institutional IRB?

Study 2

xx Same

Conclusion

xx The conclusion bridges back to the thesis statement; it essentially summarizes the discussion in alignment with what was predicted in the thesis statement.

References

xx References should be listed alphabetically, double-spaced and hanging indented.