Complete Peer Review Activity using the Students' Posted Draft of Lesson Plan in this Discussion Board. (Due by 11:59pm, June 16) Each student will be assigned to review 2 of other students' draft of

LED 6510 Lesson Plan Peer Review Form

Title of Lesson Plan Reviewed: Verb Tenses

Your Peer’s Name:

Your Name:

Directions: Each student will be assigned 2 peers’ draft of final lesson plan for review on Canvas. Upon completion of reading, do provide your feedback to your peers using the following directions:

1) use the peer-review form to provide overall feedback for the other students' draft of lesson plan; Attach the forms with your feedback to your peers while you have completed peer review activity; 

• Per the requirement, each student’ draft of lesson plan should include the following components (The other components are optional depending on each individual’s progress, so you just provide your feedback based on the content in the lesson plan)

• The below section is mandary to be reviewd and provided with feedback using the guided question in this form, highlighted in red in the form

  • Language comparison, grammar focus of instruction, and establishment of relevance

  • Introductory Statement of Your Language Task

  • Structured input activity, structured practice activity and output assessment activity

2) For the grammatical, spelling, mechanic and other suggestions, kindly use the "Review" or "Track changes" button in the student's original word document and post your comment on the right side of the column of the word document, and then return the document to your peers with your comment/feedback. 

1. Does the author clearly present the grade level of students, concentration domain, materials and digital tools need and time needed for the lesson?

Yes

1. Does the author concisely describe the following aspects in Learners & Learning Environment? How can the author improve in each aspect, if any?

Great description here, the reader was able to get a good understanding of your students and the language difference.

• Language comparison, grammar focus of instruction, and establishment of relevance:

• Clear and concise

• Introductory Statement of Your Language Task

Clear and concise

• Review of Terminology

No problems understanding terms

• Annotation

• Spelling error I highlited in red “hypothesis”

1. Does the author concisely define the following aspects in Standard and Outcomes? How can the author improve in each aspect, if any?

Only one standard was provided

No outcomes provided

1. Does the author understand the concepts of structured input activity, structured practice activity and output/assessment activity clearly and concisely?

None provided

Does the author demonstrate the structured input activity, structured practice activity and output/assessment activity in a clear and organized way? Does the author provide teaching resources where appropriate and provide detailed explanations and guidelines for this activity? How can the author improve in this area?

None provided

Notes: You may take the following notes from assignment directions to better evaluate your peer’s instructional activity.

• • Structured Input Activity

• None provided

Design a Structured Input Activity appropriate to your lesson. This activity must make the grammatical element salient to the learner and must follow principles discussed in class.

None provided

• • Structured Practice Activity

You must design a Practice Activity appropriate your lesson. This activity must provide the learner with an opportunity to practice the grammatical element without having to actually produce the grammatical element and should adhere to the principles discussed in class.

None provided

• • Output/Assessment Activity

You must design an Output/Assessment Activity that fits the context of your lesson. This activity must provide an opportunity to “check understanding” via production of the form in some way. It should follow the principles discussed in class.

None provided

Your Comments and Feedback:

I wonder if you submiited the correct version of your document? Many areas were blank.

1. Does the author provide annonations as required? Does the author’s annotations indicate understanding of referenced SLA theory? Does the author’s instructional decision is appropriately informed by reference SLA theory?

Only one annotation provided – under terminology

1. Write your constructive feedback for the author to improve his/her lesson plan in the next stage (grammar, A.P.A., spelling, annonations, other suggestions, etc..)

I only was able to comment on section A and B other areas were not provided.