In the first two course assignments, you analyzed conflicts from both an interpersonal and an institutional perspective. While the conflicts were different, did you notice any themes? How about self-a

6/16/2020 Conflict Negotiation and Resolution Scoring Guide https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/COM/COM3700/190400/Scoring_Guides/u10a1_scoring_guide.html 1/1 Conflict Negotiation and Resolution Scoring Guide Due D ate : E nd o f W eek 1 0 P erc en ta g e o f C ours e G ra d e: 2 0% . CRIT E R IA N O N-P ER FO RM ANCE BASIC P R O FIC IE N T DIS TIN G UIS H ED A naly ze c o nsis te n t th em es in t h e co nflic t.

1 7% D oes n ot a naly ze co nsis te nt th em es in t h e c o nflic t. Id entif ie s fa cto rs re sp onsib le fo r co nflic t b ut d oes not s h ow h ow th e fa cto rs r e la te to a n org aniz a tio n. A naly ze s c o nsis te nt th em es in th e co nflic t. A naly ze s c o nsis te nt th em es in th e c o nflic t a nd h ow th ey help , o r h in der, c o nflic t re so lu tio n. A naly ze y o ur beh avio rs in t h e co nflic t.

1 7% D oes n ot a naly ze y o ur behavio rs in th e co nflic t. Id entif ie s y o ur behavio rs in th e co nflic t. A naly ze s y o ur behavio rs in th e co nflic t. A naly ze s y o ur b ehavio rs in t h e c o nflic t a nd h ow th ey aff e cte d o th er p artic ip ants . A pply a c o nflic t re so lu tio n s ty le a p pro pria te t o t h e co nflic t.

1 7% D oes n ot a pply a c o nflic t r e so lu tio n sty le a ppro pria te to th e c o nflic t. A pplie s a c o nflic t re so lu tio n s ty le t h at is n ot appro pria te to th e c o nflic t. A pplie s a c o nflic t re so lu tio n s ty le a ppro pria te to th e co nflic t. A pplie s a c o nflic t r e so lu tio n sty le a ppro pria te to th e co nflic t a nd p ro vid es s o und re aso nin g fo r th e c h oic e . D ete rm in e w heth er th e o utc o m es w hen u sin g t h e s ele cte d co nflic t r e so lu tio n sty le w ould b e dif fe re n t o r r e m ain t h e s am e.

17% D oes n ot d ete rm in e w heth er th e o utc o m es w hen u sin g th e se le cte d c o nflic t re so lu tio n s ty le w ould b e d if f e re nt o r r e m ain t h e s a m e. Id entif ie s possib le o utc o m es w hen usin g th e se le cte d c o nflic t re so lu tio n s ty le . D ete rm in es w heth er th e o utc o m es w hen usin g th e s e le cte d co nflic t r e so lu tio n sty le w ould b e dif f e re nt o r r e m ain t h e s a m e. D ete rm in es w heth er th e outc o m es w hen u sin g th e se le cte d c o nflic t r e so lu tio n sty le w ould b e d if f e re nt o r re m ain th e s a m e a nd h ow th is w ould a ff e ct o th er partic ip ants . C om pose t e xt t h at artic u la te s m ean in g re le van t t o it s p urp ose a n d au die n ce.

16% D oes n ot c o m pose te xt th at a rtic u la te s m eanin g r e le va nt to it s p urp ose a nd audie nce . C om pose s te xt th at in co nsis te ntly a rtic u la te s m eanin g re le va nt to it s p urp ose a nd audie nce . C om pose s te xt th at artic u la te s m eanin g re le va nt to it s p urp ose a nd audie nce . C om pose s te xt th at artic u la te s m eanin g r e le va nt to it s p urp ose a nd a udie nce u sin g c o rre ct g ra m mar, u sa ge, a nd m ech anic s. In te g ra te in to t e xt ap pro pria te u se o f sch ola rly s o urc es an d e vid en ce.

16% D oes n ot in te gra te in to te xt a ppro pria te u se o f s ch ola rly s o urc e s a nd evid ence . In te gra te s in to te xt s o urc e s a nd evid ence th at are e it h er n ot sch ola rly o r n ot re le va nt. In te gra te s in to te xt a ppro pria te u se o f sch ola rly s o urc e s and e vid ence . In te gra te s in to te xt a ppro pria te u se o f s ch ola rly s o urc e s a nd e vid ence u sin g co rre ct A PA c it a tio n s ty le .