InstructionsReality, Art, and TruthThis 6-8 page essay assignment will be completed in three parts. You may want to use section headers to organize your paper. Remember to explain the theories you ref
Rubric Assessment
Top of Form
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D range) (1–27)
27 points
27 %
Satisfactory (C range) (28–31)
31 points
31 %
Proficient (B range) (32–35)
35 points
35 %
Exemplary (A range) (36–40)
40 points
40 %
Compare/contrast the avocado and artichoke ideas of the self. Discussed at least one specific version of each.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts
Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment concepts with some inability to fully articulate them
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply most assignments concepts
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts
/ 40
/ 40
*
Criterion score has been overridden
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D range) (1–17)
17 points
17 %
Satisfactory (C range) (18–19)
19 points
19 %
Proficient (B range) (20–22)
22 points
22 %
Exemplary (A range) (23–25)
25 points
25 %
Illustrated the avocado idea of the self by analyzing a work of art. Discussed at least one philosophy that understands art to be representational.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Work does not meet assignment expectations; no clear purpose is provided
Assignment meets expectations with minimal depth and breath; the purpose provided is vague
Assignment meets expectations with most components being addressed in good depth and breadth; the purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment
Assignment meets or exceeds expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breath; a comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment
/ 25
/ 25
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Illustrated the artichoke idea of the self by analyzing a work of art. Discussed at least one philosophy that understands art to be transformative.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Work does not meet assignment expectations; no clear purpose is provided
Assignment meets expectations with minimal depth and breath; the purpose provided is vague
Assignment meets expectations with most components being addressed in good depth and breadth; the purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment
Assignment meets or exceeds expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breath; a comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment
/ 25
/ 25
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Discussed the relationship between art, philosophy, and truth, comparing the philosophies from the reading with your own views.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Work does not meet assignment expectations; no clear purpose is provided
Assignment meets expectations with minimal depth and breath; the purpose provided is vague
Assignment meets expectations with most components being addressed in good depth and breadth; the purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment
Assignment meets or exceeds expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breath; a comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment
/ 25
/ 25
*
Criterion score has been overridden
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D range) (1–20)
20 points
20 %
Satisfactory (C range) (21–23)
23 points
23 %
Proficient (B range) (24–26)
26 points
26 %
Exemplary (A range) (27–30)
30 points
30 %
Substantiated content with the course texts
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Work is not substantiated by sources or sources supplied do not have credibility
Summarizes information gleaned from the course texts to support major points, but does not synthesize; provides minimal justification to support major topics
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from the course texts to support major points presented
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from the course texts to support major points presented
/ 30
/ 30
*
Criterion score has been overridden
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D range) (1–10)
10 points
10 %
Satisfactory (C range) (11)
11 points
11 %
Proficient (B range) (12–13)
13 points
13 %
Exemplary (A range) (14–15)
15 points
15 %
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Errors in basic writing conventions are sufficiently numerous to prevent reader comprehension
Submission contains incoherent or inconsistent presentation of ideas, which prevents understanding the majority of author’s overall intent
The reader can follow the author’s overall intent as stated; there may be errors in basic writing conventions but these do not interfere with reader comprehension
The writer’s overall argument and language are clear and focused, leaving the reader with no confusion about author’s intent; the text is basically error free
/ 15
/ 15
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Used APA formatted citations and references, and used correct structural formatting
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
No attempt at Academic/APA formatting
Academic/APA format is attempted but errors are distracting
Using Academic/APA format, accurately; errors are noticeable but minor
Using Academic/APA format proficiently; text is basically error free
/ 15
/ 15
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Rubric Total Score Total Total Score
Clear Override
/ 175
/ 175
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
No Submission0 points minimum
Clear Override
Emerging (F through D range)1 point minimum
Clear Override
Satisfactory (C range)122 points minimum
Clear Override
Proficient (B range)140 points minimum
Clear Override
Exemplary (A range)157 points minimum
Clear Override
Overall Feedback
| Associated Learning Objectives | |
|
| PHI2301.02 Compare and contrast philosophies of self |
| Assessment Method: Score on Criteria - Compare/contrast the avocado and artichoke ideas of the self. Discussed at least one specific version of each. | |
| Required Performance: Satisfactory (C range) (28–31) | |
|
| PHI2301.02 Compare and contrast philosophies of self |
| Assessment Method: Score on Criteria - Illustrated the avocado idea of the self by analyzing a work of art. Discussed at least one philosophy that understands art to be representational. | |
| Required Performance: Satisfactory (C range) (18–19) | |
|
| PHI2301.02 Compare and contrast philosophies of self |
| Assessment Method: Score on Criteria - Illustrated the artichoke idea of the self by analyzing a work of art. Discussed at least one philosophy that understands art to be transformative. | |
| Required Performance: Satisfactory (C range) (18–19) | |
|
| PHI2301.03 Approaches to epistemological and metaphysical questions |
| Assessment Method: Score on Criteria - Illustrated the avocado idea of the self by analyzing a work of art. Discussed at least one philosophy that understands art to be representational. | |
| Required Performance: Satisfactory (C range) (18–19) | |
|
| PHI2301.03 Approaches to epistemological and metaphysical questions |
| Assessment Method: Score on Criteria - Illustrated the artichoke idea of the self by analyzing a work of art. Discussed at least one philosophy that understands art to be transformative. | |
| Required Performance: Satisfactory (C range) (18–19) | |
|
| PHI2301.03 Approaches to epistemological and metaphysical questions |
| Assessment Method: Score on Criteria - Discussed the relationship between art, philosophy, and truth, comparing the philosophies from the reading with your own views. | |
| Required Performance: Satisfactory (C range) (18–19) | |
Close
Bottom of Form
