Reviewthe "IRAC Method" section of Ch. 1 of Legal Environment of Business.Researchone legal case or recent event involving a tort and one legal case or recent event related to criminal law. Each case
Critical legal thinking requires special application in the digital age. Juries and judges are often called on to apply laws enacted prior to the digital age to cases and legal issues that arise in the electronic environment and that had not been contemplated when the law was enacted. Critical legal thinking must also be used by the U.S. Congress and state legislatures as they enact new laws that specifically address new issues of the digital environment.
IRAC Method
Legal cases are usually examined using the following critical legal thinking method. First, the facts of the case must be investigated and understood. Next, the legal issue that is to be answered must be identified and succinctly stated. Then the law that is to be applied to the case must be identified, read, and understood. Once the facts, law, and legal issue have been stated, critical thinking must be used in applying the law to the facts of the case. This requires that the decision maker—whether a judge, juror, or student—analyze, examine, evaluate, interpret, and apply the law to the facts of the case. Last, the critical legal thinker must reach a conclusion and state his or her judgment. In the study of law, this process is often referred to as the IRAC method (IRAC is an acronym that stands for issue, rule, application, and conclusion), as outlined in the following:
IRAC method
A method used to examine a law case. IRAC is an acronym that stands for issue, rule, application, and conclusion.
I = What is the legal issue in the case?
R = What is the rule (law) of the case?
A = What is the court’s analysis and rationale?
C = What was the conclusion or outcome of the case?
This text—whether in its print or electronic version—offer students ample opportunities to develop and apply critical legal thinking. The text contains real-world cases in which actual disputing parties have become embroiled. The law cases are real, the parties are real, and the decisions reached by juries and judges are real. Some cases are easier to decide than others, but all provide a unique set of facts that require critical legal thinking to solve.
