Topic: Project ScopePart 1: Identify at least 2 advantages and 2 disadvantages of reducing project scope to accelerate a project. Discuss what could be done to reduce the disadvantages. Post an 500–75

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content 35 points

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Thread: Content

35 to 32 points

All key components of the Group Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread. The thread has a clear, logical flow. Major points are stated clearly. Major points are supported by good examples or thoughtful analysis.

31 to 25 points

Most of the components of the Group Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably well. Major points are supported by good examples or thoughtful analysis.

24 to 1 points

The Group Discussion Board Forum prompt are addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis.

0 points

Thread is not provided.

Structure 15 points

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Grammar and APA

5 points

No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise and word choice is appropriate. APA formatting for citations and references is accurate.

4 points

Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient and word choice is adequate. APA formatting for citations and references is accurate overall.

3 to 1 points

Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Inconsistent APA formatting for citations and references.

0 points

Thread is not provided or numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Writing style is difficult to understand and APA is not followed.

Materials/Resources

10 to 9 points

Academic materials are seamlessly integrated into the discussion. At least three scholarly resource, the Bible, and the text are cited and an accurate reference list is provided.

8 to 7 points

Academic materials are integrated into the discussion. One of the required resources may not be included and a reference list is provided.

6 to 1 points

Academic materials are integrated into the discussion, though not all required scholarly resources are cited and/or an inconsistent reference list is provided.

0 points

Thread is not provided or post is not supported by resources.