The Good LifeThe final graded assignment is an 8-10 page paper on the question: what is the good life? This assignment will be completed in four parts, so you may want to use section headers to organi

Rubric Assessment

Top of Form

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F through D range) (1–34)

34 points

34 %

Satisfactory (C range) (35–39)

39 points

39 %

Proficient (B range) (40–44)

44 points

44 %

Exemplary (A range) (45–50)

50 points

50 %

Criterion Score

Compared/contrasted deontology and utilitarianism. Discussed the consequentialism debate.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment concepts with some inability to fully articulate them

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply most assignments concepts

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts

/ 50

Criterion score has been overridden

Explained classical and contemporary versions of virtue ethics. Discussed how the focus on character distinguishes these approaches from deontology and utilitarianism.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment concepts with some inability to fully articulate them

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply most assignments concepts

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts

/ 50

Criterion score has been overridden

Illustrated the theories discussed with examples including situations relevant to your current or future career.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Work does not meet assignment expectations; no clear purpose is provided

Assignment meets expectations with minimal depth and breath; the purpose provided is vague

Assignment meets expectations with most components being addressed in good depth and breadth; the purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment

Assignment meets or exceeds expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breath; a comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment

/ 50

Criterion score has been overridden

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F through D range) (1–27)

27 points

27 %

Satisfactory (C range) (28–31)

31 points

31 %

Proficient (B range) (32–35)

35 points

35 %

Exemplary (A range) (36–40)

40 points

40 %

Criterion Score

Substantiated content with the course texts

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Work is not substantiated by sources or sources supplied do not have credibility

Summarizes information gleaned from the course texts to support major points, but does not synthesize; provides minimal justification to support major topics

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from the course texts to support major points presented

/ 40

Criterion score has been overridden

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F through D range) (1–20)

20 points

20 %

Satisfactory (C range) (21–23)

23 points

23 %

Proficient (B range) (24–26)

26 points

26 %

Exemplary (A range) (27–30)

30 points

30 %

Criterion Score

Explained existentialism and discussed the role of free will in ethics.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment concepts with some inability to fully articulate them

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply most assignments concepts

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts

/ 30

Criterion score has been overridden

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F through D range) (1–10)

10 points

10 %

Satisfactory (C range) (11)

11 points

11 %

Proficient (B range) (12–13)

13 points

13 %

Exemplary (A range) (14–15)

15 points

15 %

Criterion Score

Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Errors in basic writing conventions are sufficiently numerous to prevent reader comprehension

Submission contains incoherent or inconsistent presentation of ideas, which prevents understanding the majority of author’s overall intent

The reader can follow the author’s overall intent as stated; there may be errors in basic writing conventions but these do not interfere with reader comprehension

The writer’s overall argument and language are clear and focused, leaving the reader with no confusion about author’s intent; the text is basically error free

/ 15

Criterion score has been overridden

Used APA formatted citations and references, and used correct structural formatting

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

No attempt at Academic/APA formatting

Academic/APA format is attempted but errors are distracting

Using Academic/APA format, accurately; errors are noticeable but minor

Using Academic/APA format proficiently; text is basically error free

/ 15

Criterion score has been overridden

Rubric Total Score Total Total Score

Clear Override

/ 250

Criterion score has been overridden

Overall Score

Overall Score

No Submission0 points minimum

Clear Override

Emerging (F through D range)1 point minimum

Clear Override

Satisfactory (C range)175 points minimum

Clear Override

Proficient (B range)200 points minimum

Clear Override

Exemplary (A range)225 points minimum

Clear Override

Overall Feedback

Bottom of Form