Employers have been coming up with innovative employee rewards to boost morale and acknowledge employee needs for creativity and personal goal accomplishment. Some of the latest potential employee rew

T ext E m plo ye rs ha ve been comin g up with in no va tiv e em plo ye e re w ard s to boost mora le and ackn ow le dge em plo ye e ne eds fo r cr eativ ity and perso na l goal acco mpli sh ment. Som e of th e la te st pote ntia l em plo ye e re w ard s in cl ud e usi ng th e In te rn e t at work fo r perso na l re aso ns such as shoppin g , communica tin g with fr ie nd s, or perso na l fin a nce s; brin g in g a pet to work; in st itu tin g a contr o lle d na ppin g poli cy , and sports and office bettin g pools. Write an eig ht- to te n-p age paper in which yo u: 1. D ete rm in e ho w in no va tio ns in em plo ye e bene fits can im pro ve th e ove ra ll competitiv e compensa tio n stra te gy of th e org aniz a tio n. 2. E xp la in ho w in no va tiv e bene fits could be tie d to speci fic jo bs. 3. C ritiq ue th e effe ct iv e ne ss of equity -b ase d re w ard s system s ve rsu s th o se with more creativ e appro ach es. 4. D iscu ss th e key ele m ents of in te gra tin g in no va tio n in to a tr a ditio na l to ta l re w ard s pro gra m . 5. R eco mmend a pro ce ss th a t optim iz e s an em plo ye e-b ase d suggest io n pro gra m to contin ua lly re fr e sh th e to ta l re w ard s of th e o rg aniz a tio n. 6. U se at le ast fiv e qua li ty aca dem ic re so urce s in th is assi gnm ent. Note : Wiki pedia and oth e r websi te s do no t qua li ty as aca dem ic r e so urce s. This course re quir e s th e use of Str a ye r Writin g Sta nd ard s. For assi stance and in fo rm atio n, ple ase re fe r to th e Str a ye r Writin g S ta nd ard s li n k in th e le ft- h a nd menu of yo ur course .

The speci fic course le arn in g outco me asso ciate d with th is assi gnm ent is: D ete rm in e in no va tiv e appro ach es fo r optim iz in g em plo ye e bene fits and re w ard s system s. Sco rin g Guid e Dete rm in e h ow in novatio ns in e m plo ye e b enefit s c an im pro ve t h e o vera ll c o m petit iv e c o m pensatio n s tr a te gy o f th e o rg an iza tio n. 2 0 % U nacce pta ble D id no t subm it or in co mple te ly dete rm in e d ho w in no va tio ns in em plo ye e bene fits can im pro ve th e o ve ra ll competitiv e co mpensa tio n stra te gy of th e o rg aniz a tio n. N eeds Im pro ve ment P artia lly dete rm in e d ho w in no va tio ns in em plo ye e bene fits can im pro ve th e o ve ra ll competitiv e co mpensa tio n stra te gy of th e o rg aniz a tio n. C om pete nt S atisf act orily dete rm in e d ho w in no va tio ns in em plo ye e bene fits can im pro ve th e o ve ra ll competitiv e co mpensa tio n stra te gy of th e o rg aniz a tio n. E xe m pla ry T ho ro ug hly dete rm in e d ho w in no va tio ns in em plo ye e bene fits can im pro ve th e o ve ra ll competitiv e co mpensa tio n stra te gy of th e o rg aniz a tio n. Exp la in h ow in novativ e b enefit s c o uld b e t ie d t o s p ecif ic jo bs. 1 5 % U nacce pta ble D id no t subm it or in co mple te ly exp la in e d ho w in no va tiv e bene fits could be tie d to speci fic jo bs. Needs Im pro ve ment P artia lly exp la in e d ho w in no va tiv e bene fits could be tie d to speci fic jo bs. C om pete nt S atisf act orily exp la in e d ho w in no va tiv e bene fits could be tie d to speci fic jo bs. Exe m pla ry T ho ro ug hly exp la in e d ho w in no va tiv e bene fits could be tie d to speci fic jo bs. C rit iq ue t h e e ffe ctiv eness o f e quit y -b ase d r e w ard s s ys te m s vers u s t h ose w it h m ore c re ativ e a p pro ach es. 2 0 % U nacce pta ble D id no t subm it or in co mple te ly critiq ue d th e e ffe ct iv e ne ss of equity -b ase d re w ard s system s ve rsu s th o se with more creativ e a ppro ach es. Needs Im pro ve ment P artia lly critiq ue d th e e ffe ct iv e ne ss of equity -b ase d re w ard s system s ve rsu s th o se with more creativ e a ppro ach es. C om pete nt S atisf act orily critiq ue d th e e ffe ct iv e ne ss of equity -b ase d re w ard s system s ve rsu s th o se with more creativ e a ppro ach es. Exe m pla ry T ho ro ug hly critiq ue d th e e ffe ct iv e ne ss of equity -b ase d re w ard s system s ve rsu s th o se with more creativ e a ppro ach es. D is cu ss t h e k e y e le m ents o f in te gra tin g in novatio n in to a t r a d it io nal t o ta l r e w ard s p ro gra m . 1 5 % U nacce pta ble D id no t subm it or in co mple te ly discu sse d th e ke y ele m ents of in te gra tin g in no va tio n in to a tr a ditio na l to ta l re w ard s pro gra m . Needs Im pro ve ment P artia lly discu sse d th e key ele m ents of in te gra tin g in no va tio n in to a tr a ditio na l to ta l re w ard s pro gra m . Com pete nt S atisf act orily discu sse d th e ke y ele m ents of in te gra tin g in no va tio n in to a tr a ditio na l to ta l re w ard s pro gra m . Exe m pla ry T ho ro ug hly discu sse d th e key ele m ents of in te gra tin g in no va tio n in to a tr a ditio na l to ta l re w ard s pro gra m . Reco m mend a p ro ce ss t h at o ptim ize s a n e m plo ye e-b ase d su ggestio n p ro gra m t o c o ntin ually r e fr e sh t h e t o ta l r e w ard s of t h e o rg an iza tio n. 1 5 % U nacce pta ble D id no t subm it or in co mple te ly re co mmend ed a pro ce ss th a t optim iz e s an em plo ye e-b ase d suggest io n pro gra m to contin ua lly re fr e sh th e to ta l re w ard s of th e o rg aniz a tio n. N eeds Im pro ve ment P artia lly re co mmend ed a pro ce ss th a t optim iz e s an em plo ye e-b ase d suggest io n pro gra m to contin ua lly re fr e sh th e to ta l re w ard s of th e o rg aniz a tio n. C om pete nt S atisf act orily re co mmend ed a pro ce ss th a t optim iz e s an em plo ye e-b ase d suggest io n pro gra m to contin ua lly re fr e sh th e to ta l re w ard s of th e o rg aniz a tio n. E xe m pla ry T ho ro ug hly re co mmend ed a pro ce ss th a t optim iz e s an em plo ye e-b ase d suggest io n pro gra m to contin ua lly re fr e sh th e to ta l re w ard s of th e o rg aniz a tio n. F iv e r e fe re nce s. 5 % U nacce pta ble N o re fe re nce s pro vid ed. Needs Im pro ve ment D oes no t meet th e re quir e d num ber of re fe re nce s; some or all re fe re nce s poor qua li ty ch oice s. Com pete nt M eets num ber of re quir e d re fe re nce s; all re fe re nce s hig h qua li ty choice s. Exe m pla ry E xce eds num ber of re quir e d re fe re nce s; all re fe re nce s hig h qua li ty choice s. Cla rit y , w rit in g m ech an ic s, a n d f o rm attin g r e quir e m ents . 1 0 % U nacce pta ble M ore th a n 6 erro rs pre se nt. N eeds Im pro ve ment 5 –6 erro rs pre se nt. C om pete nt 3 –4 erro rs pre se nt. E xe m pla ry 0 –2 erro rs pre se nt.