Week 1 Project Assignment Due July 20 at 11:59 PM Assignment 3—Waterborne Outbreak of Cryptosporidium InfectionsPublic health response is crucial in the event of an infectious disease outbreak to re

PHE4095 Week 1 Project Rubric

Rubric Assessment

Top of Form

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Evidence

0 points

0 %

Unsatisfactory (F through D Range)

17 points

17 %

Emerging (C Range)

19 points

19 %

Proficient (B Range)

22 points

22 %

Exemplary (A Range)

25 points

25 %

Criterion Score

Discusses the health issue in the case study as well as the response methods to the health issue in chronological order.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Details of health issue as well as the response methods in chronological order are missing or inaccurate.

Details of health issue as well as the response methods in chronological order are vague or incomplete.

Details of health issue as well as the response methods in chronological order are somewhat vague or incomplete.

Details of health issue as well as the response methods in chronological order are complete and comprehensive.

/ 25

Criterion score has been overridden

Evaluates the case study for appropriateness of response by both local and state officials.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Details of appropriateness of response by both local and state officials involved in this issue are missing or inaccurate.

Details of appropriateness of response by both local and state officials involved in this issue are vague or incomplete.

Details of appropriateness of response by both local and state officials involved in this issue are somewhat vague or incomplete.

Details of appropriateness of response by both local and state officials involved in this issue are complete and comprehensive

/ 25

Criterion score has been overridden

Evaluates the readiness and proficiency of the city health officials in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Details of the readiness and proficiency of the city health officials in Milwaukee, Wisconsin are missing or inaccurate.

Details of the readiness and proficiency of the city health officials in Milwaukee, Wisconsin are vague or incomplete.

Analysis is not accurate or complete.

Specific details of the readiness and proficiency of the city health officials in Milwaukee, Wisconsin are present but more could have been used to provide better application to the issue.

Specific details of the readiness and proficiency of the city health officials in Milwaukee, Wisconsin are present to support the issue.

/ 25

Criterion score has been overridden

Discusses more effective response methods for the public health response in this case study.

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Details of more effective response methods for the public health response in this case study are missing or inaccurate.

Details of more effective response methods for the public health response in this case study are vague or incomplete.

Details of more effective response methods for the public health response in this case study are present but more could have been used to provide better discussion to the issue.

Details of more effective response methods for the public health response in this case study are present to support the issue.

/ 25

Criterion score has been overridden

Written Components

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Introduction is limited or missing entirely.

Poorly organized document.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.

No attempt at APA formatting.

Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Poorly organized document that interferes with readability and comprehension.

Transitions are sporadic.

Conclusion is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that interferes with readability and comprehension.

APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and cite; but errors are significant.

Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

Loosely organized document that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.

APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and cite; but a few errors present.

Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background information, and clearly states the topic.

Well organized document with an appropriate introduction.

Transitions are thoughtful and clearly show how ideas relate.

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout that helps establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.

APA format is used throughout when appropriate or called for.

/ 25

Criterion score has been overridden

Rubric Total Score Total Total Score

Clear Override

/ 125

Criterion score has been overridden

Overall Score

Overall Score

No Evidence0 points minimum

Clear Override

Unsatisfactory (F through D Range)85 points minimum

Clear Override

Emerging (C Range)95 points minimum

Clear Override

Proficient (B Range)110 points minimum

Clear Override

Exemplary (A Range)125 points minimum

Clear Override

Overall Feedback

Bottom of Form