A total of three tasks to be completed with being plagiarized and with a minimum of two references for each question (attach plagiarism report): Case Study: Answer the two questions appropriately at t
Response 2 (Minimum 200 words):
Q1.
Deciding whether to bid on a project it often more complex. There are lots of objectives and subjective factors take needs to be taken into consideration. There are different factors to be considered by meetings and Marvin has to choose one of them. This arrangement is definitely recognized with demanding tasks and full-scale circumstances. The cost of bidding on contracts was very high, and clients knew that require the company to expend a huge deal of cash bidding on the job may force a no –bid on the job (Kerzner, 2009). Marvin and his group should think whether their corporation is appropriate for contract of the kind cost reimbursable because in this agreement type the buyer pays for each labor package, so the return is less compared to fixed cost project. Existing clients request for a discount on present contract and potentially request for more cutthroat price on upcoming contracts.
Q2.
From the Case Study, it is obvious that Marvin and his team frequently work on fixed price contracts, and is therefore very probable that their level of ability, knowledge, and experience in functioning on such project. There are a lot of critical factors that facilitate the corporation if they can acquire this contract (Cleden, 2016). The most main to think this is the essential agreement compare to all other agreement that Marvin Corporation ever received in its narration. Lastly, it is useful for Marvin Company by allowing for all these factors, so they have to bid for the job. Before choose to offer intentionally identify the entire possible hazard that may appear on the position. Monitors tender proceedings, process, and determinations for the task and rely on specific information from a similar company whose risk you have to arrive to identify
Respond to the above two answers by :
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence
