Critical Review the question in attachment as well as examplar of the assessment word limit: 900 words 4 referencing Harved style

24-A ug-2 019 0 2:1 1P M ( U TC +1000) S ubm is sio n ID :

1162898344 F ile n am e:

Assig nm ent_ 1_-_ pedagogy_ of_ th e_oppre sse d.d ocx (2 2.3 3K ) W ord c o unt:

1316 C hara cte r c o unt:

7559 Fabulo us in tr o !

(2 000) out (2 000) s ; OM G, R ach ael. .. B rillia ntly put! Spot on!

Spellin g 1 2 (2 019) Fabulo us!

Gre at c rit ic a l s e lf - re fle ctio n, R ach ael.

Exce lle nt!

3 What c a n I sa y... ju st brillia nt!

so tr u e... lo ve th at quote !

Yes!!

d Dear R ach ael Wow ... ju st w ow ! W hat a n a bso lu te g em th is w as to r e ad!

A s o phis tic a te d a nd v e ry w ell- a rg ued a naly sis th at was a ls o s im ult a neously w rit te n in a c ry sta l- c le ar a nd flo w in g s ty le . Y ou h ave a v e ry fin e a naly tic a l m in d a nd y o u a ls o h ave th e c a pacit y to s p eak/w rit e s im ply a nd c le arly - a r a re c o m bin atio n.

I a m s o h appy to s e e th at y o u a ls o c o nsu lt e d A borig in al lit e ra tu re ( w rit te n b y a n A borig in al r e se arc h er) to s u pport y o ur d is cu ssio n in r e la tio n to th e o ppre ssio n a nd lib era tio n o f Aborig in al p eople . T his is a M UST s o to m in im is e fu rth er o ppre ssio n o f g ra ssro ots a nd A borig in al v o ic e s, a s y o u s o elo quently s ta te d w it h in y o ur p aper a s w ell. C ongra ts , R ach ael. Best w is h es fo r y o ur s tu die s a nd m any s o cia l ju stic e in vo lv e m ents :) Nic ky Rese arc h : 1 0 C onte nt: 1 0 S tr u ctu re : 9 QM FIN AL G RAD E 2 9 /3 0 Asse ssm ent 1 - 1 9316736 GRAD EM AR K R EPO RT GEN ER AL C O M MEN TS In str u cto r PAG E 1 Text C om men t.

Fabulo us in tr o !

Text C om men t.

(2 000) Text C om men t.

out Text C om men t.

(2 000) Text C om men t.

s Text C om men t.

; Text C om men t.

OM G, R ach ael. .. B rillia ntly p ut!

PAG E 2 Text C om men t.

Spot o n!

Spellin g You n eed to r u n a s p ell- c h eck o n y o ur w ork a nd c h eck th e s p ellin g o f y o ur r e fe re nce s c a re fu lly . Y ou will a ls o n eed to m anually p ro of- re ad y o ur w ork A FTE R y o u r u n a s p ell- c h eck b eca use s o m etim es word s a re a uto -c o rre cte d in co rre ctly . V is it th e ‘F in is h in g a nd s u bm it tin g’ s e ctio n o f th e S tu dy S m art websit e ( http ://w este rn syd ney.e du.a u/s tu dysm art/h om e/a ssig nm ent_ help /w rit in g ) a nd d ow nlo ad th e re so urc e s o n E dit in g ( http ://w este rn syd ney.e du.a u/_ _data /a sse ts /p df_ file /0 005/1 082480/E dit in g.p df ) and P ro ofr e adin g ( http ://w este rn syd ney.e du.a u/_ _data /a sse ts /p df_ file /0 010/1 082683/P ro ofr e adin g.p df ).

Com men t 1 Who? F alz o n?

Com men t 2 When c it in g a d ir e ct q uote , p le ase a dd th e p age n um ber o r s e ctio n n um ber w it h in th e in -te xt c it a tio n.

Text C om men t.

(2 019) Text C om men t.

Fabulo us!

Text C om men t.

Gre at c rit ic a l s e lf - re fle ctio n, R ach ael.

Text C om men t.

Exce lle nt!

Com men t 3 FY I The te rm s ' In dig en ous ' a nd ' Aborig in al (s )' s h ould a lw ays b e cap it a lis ed when r e fe rrin g to In dig en ous Austr a lia ns a nd A ustr a lia n. U nle ss when u se d in a g enera l s e nse to r e fe r to th e orig in al in habi PAG E 3 Text C om men t.

What c a n I s a y... ju st b rillia nt!

Text C om men t.

so tr u e... lo ve th at q uote !

Text C om men t.

Yes!!

Text C om men t.

d PAG E 4 Text C om men t.

Dear R ach ael Wow ... ju st w ow ! W hat a n a bso lu te g em th is w as to r e ad!

A s o phis tic a te d a nd v e ry w ell- a rg ued a naly sis th at w as a ls o s im ult a neously writ te n in a c ry sta l- c le ar a nd flo w in g s ty le . Y ou h ave a v e ry fin e a naly tic a l m in d a nd yo u a ls o h ave th e c a pacit y to s p eak/w rit e s im ply a nd c le arly - a r a re c o m bin atio n.

I a m so h appy to s e e th at y o u a ls o c o nsu lt e d A borig in al lit e ra tu re ( w rit te n b y a n A borig in al re se arc h er) to s u pport y o ur d is cu ssio n in r e la tio n to th e o ppre ssio n a nd lib era tio n o f Aborig in al p eople . T his is a M UST s o to m in im is e fu rth er o ppre ssio n o f g ra ssro ots a nd Aborig in al v o ic e s, a s y o u s o e lo quently s ta te d w it h in y o ur p aper a s w ell. C ongra ts , Rach ael. Best w is h es fo r y o ur s tu die s a nd m any s o cia l ju stic e in vo lv e m ents :) Nic ky Rese arc h : 1 0 C onte nt: 1 0 S tr u ctu re : 9 RUBR IC : C SA C RIT IC AL R EVIE W RESEAR CH FA IL (4 ) PASS (6 ) CRED IT (7 ) DIS TIN CTIO N (8 ) HIG H D IS TIN CTIO N (1 0) CO NTE N T FA IL (4 ) PASS (6 ) CRED IT (7 ) DIS TIN CTIO N (8 ) HIG H D IS TIN CTIO N (1 0) ORG AN IS ATIO N FA IL 28 / 3 0 10 / 1 0 1. N o r e le va nt r e se arc h 2 . N o u nders ta ndin g o f th e fr a m ew ork s in th e le ctu re s, w ork sh ops and R eco m mended R eadin gs a nd R eso urc e s in to th e C rit ic a l R evie w . 3 . R ese arc h h as not b een u se d to d eve lo p a rg um ent/s u pport k e y p oin ts .

1. M in im al r e se arc h 2 M in im al u nders ta ndin g o r in co rp ora tio n o f th e fr a m ew ork s in th e le ctu re s, w ork sh ops a nd R eco m mended R eadin gs a nd R eso urc e s in to th e C rit ic a l Revie w . 3 . H as a tte m pte d to u se r e se arc h to d eve lo p a rg um ent/s u pport k e y p oin ts .

1. H as r e se arc h ed c a re fu lly .

2. H as in co rp ora te d a nd u tilis e d th e fr a m ew ork s in th e le ctu re s, w ork sh ops a nd R eco m mended R eadin gs a nd R eso urc e s in to th e C rit ic a l Revie w . 3 . H as a tte m pte d to u se r e se arc h to d eve lo p th e m ajo rit y o f th e arg um ent/s u pport k e y p oin ts .

1. H as r e se arc h ed w id ely , c a re fu lly a nd c re ativ e ly . 2 . C rit ic a lly in co rp ora te d a nd u tilis e d th e fr a m ew ork s in th e le ctu re s, w ork sh ops a nd R eco m mended R eadin gs a nd R eso urc e s in to th e C rit ic a l R evie w . 3 . R ese arc h h as b een u se d to c rit ic a lly d eve lo p arg um ent/s u pport k e y p oin ts .

1. H as r e se arc h ed w id ely , c a re fu lly a nd c re ativ e ly 2 . C rit ic a lly in co rp ora te d a nd u tilis e d th e fr a m ew ork s in th e le ctu re s, w ork sh ops a nd R eco m mended R eadin gs a nd R eso urc e s in to th e C rit ic a l R evie w . 3 . R ese arc h h as b een u se d to c rit ic a lly & c o nvin cin gly d eve lo p arg um ent/s u pport k e y p oin ts .

10 / 1 0 1. H as n ot a nsw ere d th e q uestio ns. 2 . H as n ot lin ke d F re ir e ’s th eory to o ur o w n w ork .

1. H as a tte m pte d to a nsw er th e q uestio ns. 2 . H as a tte m pte d to m ake th e lin k b etw een Fre ir e ’s th eory a nd a pplic a tio n to o ur o w n w ork .

1. H as a nsw ere d th e q uestio ns, a nd c le arly in tr o duce d & c rit ic a lly e ngaged w it h r e le va nt id eas fr o m F re ir e ’s w ork . 2 . H as a tte m pte d to c rit ic a lly a nd c o nvin cin gly m ake th e lin k betw een F re ir e ’s th eory a nd a pplic a tio n to o ur o w n w ork .

1. H as a nsw ere d th e q uestio ns, a nd c le arly in tr o duce d & c rit ic a lly e ngaged w it h r e le va nt id eas fr o m F re ir e ’s w ork . 2 . H as c rit ic a lly a nd c o nvin cin gly m ade th e lin k b etw een F re ir e ’s th eory a nd a pplic a tio n to o ur o w n w ork .

1. H as a nsw ere d th e q uestio ns, a nd c le arly in tr o duce d & c rit ic a lly e ngaged w it h r e le va nt id eas fr o m F re ir e ’s w ork . 2 . H as c rit ic a lly a nd c o nvin cin gly m ade th e lin k b etw een F re ir e ’s th eory a nd a pplic a tio n to o ur o w n w ork .

8 / 1 0 1. H as w rit te n a n u nsa tis fa cto ry C rit ic a l R evie w .

2. P oorly s tr u ctu re d.

3. P oorly w rit te n 4. (4 ) PASS (6 ) CRED IT (7 ) DIS TIN CTIO N (8 ) HIG H D IS TIN CTIO N (1 0) No o r m in im al r e fe re nce lis t.

1. H as w rit te n a s a tis fa cto ry C rit ic a l R evie w . 2 . H as a tte m pte d to s tr u ctu re c a re fu lly a nd arra nge p oin ts lo gic a lly 3. Is w rit te n in a s a tis fa cto ry m anner. 4 . H as p ro vid ed a r e fe re nce lis t 1. H as w rit te n a s o lid C rit ic a l R evie w . 2 . H as c le arly in tr o duce d th e R evie w , s tr u ctu re d ca re fu lly a nd a rra nged p oin ts lo gic a lly 3. Is w ell w rit te n w it h in th e 9 00-w ord lim it 4 . H as pro vid ed a r e fe re nce lis t w it h m in im al m is ta ke s, u tilis in g H arv a rd s yste m .

1. H as w rit te n a n o uts ta ndin g C rit ic a l R evie w . 2 . H as c le arly in tr o duce d th e R evie w , str u ctu re d c a re fu lly a nd a rra nged p oin ts lo gic a lly 3. Is w ell w rit te n w it h in th e 9 00-w ord lim it 4. H as p ro vid ed a d eta ile d r e fe re nce lis t w it h m in im al m is ta ke s, u tilis in g H arv a rd s yste m .

1. H as w rit te n a n o uts ta ndin g C rit ic a l R evie w . 2 . H as c le arly in tr o duce d th e R evie w , str u ctu re d c a re fu lly a nd a rra nged p oin ts lo gic a lly 3. Is b eautif u lly w rit te n w it h in th e 9 00- word lim it 4 . H as p ro vid ed a d eta ile d r e fe re nce lis t, u tilis in g H arv a rd s yste m .