The steps for process evaluation outlined by Bliss and Emshoff (2002) may seem very similar to those for conducting other types of evaluation that you have learned about in this course; in fact, it is

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Name: SOCW_6311_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Grid View
List View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Responsiveness to Directions	17.28 (27%) - 19.2 (30%) Paper fully addresses all instruction prompts.	15.36 (24%) - 17.26 (26.97%) Paper addresses most of the instruction prompts; however, one or more prompts may have been insufficiently addressed.	13.44 (21%) - 15.34 (23.97%) Paper addresses some of the instructions prompts, but may have missed several prompts or did not sufficiently address the majority of prompts.	0 (0%) - 13.42 (20.97%) Paper does not address the majority of instruction prompts and/or insufficiently addresses all instruction prompts.
Content	23.04 (36%) - 25.6 (40%) Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates exemplary critical thought.	20.48 (32%) - 23.01 (35.96%) Paper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates good critical thought.	17.92 (28%) - 20.45 (31.96%) Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates some critical thought.	0 (0%) - 17.89 (27.96%) Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates poor critical thought.
Writing	17.28 (27%) - 19.2 (30%) Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.	15.36 (24%) - 17.26 (26.97%) Paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources.	13.44 (21%) - 15.34 (23.97%) Paper is somewhat below graduate level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).	0 (0%) - 13.42 (20.97%) Paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Responsiveness to Directions

17.28 (27%) - 19.2 (30%)

Paper fully addresses all instruction prompts.

15.36 (24%) - 17.26 (26.97%)

Paper addresses most of the instruction prompts; however, one or more prompts may have been insufficiently addressed.

13.44 (21%) - 15.34 (23.97%)

Paper addresses some of the instructions prompts, but may have missed several prompts or did not sufficiently address the majority of prompts.

0 (0%) - 13.42 (20.97%)

Paper does not address the majority of instruction prompts and/or insufficiently addresses all instruction prompts.

Content

23.04 (36%) - 25.6 (40%)

Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates exemplary critical thought.

20.48 (32%) - 23.01 (35.96%)

Paper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates good critical thought.

17.92 (28%) - 20.45 (31.96%)

Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates some critical thought.

0 (0%) - 17.89 (27.96%)

Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates poor critical thought.

Writing

17.28 (27%) - 19.2 (30%)

Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.

15.36 (24%) - 17.26 (26.97%)

Paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources.

13.44 (21%) - 15.34 (23.97%)

Paper is somewhat below graduate level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).

0 (0%) - 13.42 (20.97%)

Paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.