Coding Matrix: Quality Indicator Instructions Overview The correct evaluation and quality implementation of interventions and research are essential within the field of education. There are many jo

EDSP 725

Coding Matrix: Quality Indicators Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Points Earned

Short Answer Questions

30 to 28 points

Each question on the coding matrix short answer word document was correctly answered by fully addressing each question.

27 to 26 points

The majority of the questions on the coding matrix short answer document were correctly answered by fully addressing each question. Basic errors in information and understand were present.

25 to 1 points

Some of the questions on the coding matrix short answer word document were correctly answered by fully addressing each question. However, some questions were answered incorrectly or were incomplete.

0 points

Largely Incomplete

Article Information

5 points

Coding matrix columns B through J contain no errors.

4 points

Coding matrix columns B through J contain 1-3 errors.

3 to 1 points

Coding matrix columns B through J contain 4-5 errors.

0 points

Largely incomplete

Assessment of Quality Indicators 1 – 5

Columns CU – DD

18 to 17 points

all group design quality indicators were correctly scored as either a 0 or 1;
article text included sufficient justification to support the decision of present or absent in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab.

16 points

all group design quality indicators were correctly scored as either a 0 or 1;
article text included provided limited justification to support the decision in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab.

15 to 1 points

quality indicators were incorrectly scored as either a 0 or 1;
no article text was included, or text provided little justification to support the decision in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab;
lacked basic concept knowledge of the quality indicator.

0 points

Largely incomplete.

Assessment of Quality Indicator

Columns DE – DM

16 to 15 points

all components of the internal validity quality indicator were correctly scored as either a 0 or 1;
article text included sufficient justification to support the decision of present or absent in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab;
all group and single-case design components were addressed correctly.

14 points

all components of the internal validity quality indicator were correctly scored as either a 0 or 1;
article text included provided limited justification to support the decision of present or absent in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab;
all group and single-case design components were addressed.

13 to 1 points

Some components of the internal validity quality indicator were incorrectly scored as either a 0 or 1;
no article text was included, or text provided little justification to support the decision of present or absent in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab;
not all group and single-case design components were addressed correctly.

0 points

Largely incomplete.

Assessment of Quality Indicator

Columns DN – DS

14 to 13 points

all components of the outcome measures / dependent variable quality indicator were correctly scored as either a 0 or 1
article text included sufficient justification to support the decision of present or absent in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab.
all group and single-case design components were addressed correctly.

12 points

all components of the outcome measures / dependent variable quality indicator were correctly scored as either a 0 or 1
article text included provided limited justification to support the decision of present or absent in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab.
all group and single-case design components were addressed correctly.

11 to 1 points

Some components of the outcome measures / dependent variable quality indicator were incorrectly scored as either a 0 or 1
no article text was included, or text provided little justification to support the decision of present or absent in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab.
not all group and single-case design components were addressed correctly.

0 points

Largely incomplete.

Assessment of Quality Indicator

Columns DT – DV

12 points

all components of the data analysis quality indicator were correctly scored as either a 0 or 1;
article text included sufficient justification to support the decision of present or absent in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab;
all group and single-case design components were addressed correctly.

11 to 10 points

all components of the data analysis quality indicator were correctly scored as either a 0 or 1
article text included provided limited justification to support the decision of present or absent in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab.
all group and single-case design components were addressed correctly.

9 to 1 points

Some components of the data analysis quality indicator were incorrectly scored as either a 0 or 1
no article text was included, or text provided little justification to support the decision of present or absent in column W or AC of the “CEC 2014 Quality Indicators” tab.
incorrect design components were addressed

0 points

Largely incomplete.

Assessment of Evidence-Based Practice Categorization Columns EA – EK

10 points

all group and single-case design components were completed correctly.

9 points

all group and single-case design components were addressed correctly. However, minor errors were included

8 to 1 points

the majority of group and single-case design categories were completed, however major errors were included

0 points

Largely incomplete.

Structure

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Points Earned

Grammar and Spelling

15 to 14 points

Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the assignment. There are 0–1 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

13 points

There are occasional errors in grammar or spelling. There are 1–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

12 to 1 points

There are 3–4 errors per page in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

0 points

There are more than 5 errors per page in the grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

Current APA Format Compliance

15 to 14 points

There are 0–1 minor errors in current APA format in the required items.

13 points

There are 2–3 minor errors in current APA format in the required items. Includes

12 to 1 points

There are more than 3 errors in current APA format in the required items.

0 points

There are more than 4 errors in current APA format in the required items.

Assignment Format

15 to 14 points

Response includes all components and meets or exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions.

Each question or part of the assignment is addressed thoroughly.

Matrix was completed maintaining template integrity.

13 points

Response includes all components and meets all requirements indicated in the instructions.

Each question or part of the assignment is addressed.

Matrix was completed however minor template errors regarding formulas were evident

12 to 1 points

Response is missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions.

Some questions or parts of the assignment are not addressed.

Matrix was completed however major template errors regarding formulas and cells were evident

0 points

Response excludes essential components and/or does not address the requirements indicated in the instructions.

Many parts of the assignment are addressed minimally, inadequately, and/or not at all.

Limited or no responses were submitted.

Matrix was incomplete with major errors to the integrity of the template

Total

/150

Instructor’s Comments: