For your Final Project, you will apply the information you have learned in this course to critically analyze a specific case study from the Co-occurring Disorders Treatment Workbook (The Louis de la P

Accuracy of responses Question 1
Overview of the Case Study (2 paragraphs)
9 points

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides clear information about the case study (2 paragraphs).

Points Range:8 (4.00%) - 8 (4.00%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Provides a basic analysis of the case study (2 paragraphs).

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 7 (3.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Provides minimal information about the case study

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 6 (3.00%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Information about the case study is minimal, has errors, or is missing

Accuracy of responses Question 2
A description of procedures and process you would use for assessment and diagnosis in the selected case study. Be sure to include rationale for your selections (bullet points with rationale)
9 points

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Clearly identifies 4-5 procedures and processes for assessment and diagnosis f the counselor under consideration. All required elements are thoroughly addressed

Points Range:8 (4.00%) - 8 (4.00%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Identifies 2 -3 procedures and processes for assessment and diagnosis

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 7 (3.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Identifies at least 1 procedure and process for assessment and diagnosis

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 6 (3.00%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Minimally Identifies procedures and processes for assessment and diagnosis

Accuracy of responses Question 3
Include an analysis of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the substances used in the case study (provide a chart that summarizes the information).
15 points

Points Range:13 (6.50%) - 15 (7.50%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a comprehensive examination of at least five pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic principles

Points Range:12 (6.00%) - 12 (6.00%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Provides an examination of 3-5 pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic principles

Points Range:10 (5.00%) - 11 (5.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Provides a minimal review of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 9 (4.50%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics is inaccurate or missing.

Accuracy of responses Question 4
Develop a diagnosis based on the DSM-5. Include a rationale that distinguishes features between substance dependence and substance abuse (2 paragraphs).
20 points

Points Range:18 (9.00%) - 20 (10.00%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Develops a diagnosis based on the DSM-5. Includes a clear rationale that distinguishes features between substance dependence and substance abuse (2 paragraphs).

Points Range:16 (8.00%) - 17 (8.50%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Develops a diagnosis based on the DSM-5. Includes minimal rationale that distinguishes features between substance dependence and substance abuse (2 paragraphs).

Points Range:14 (7.00%) - 15 (7.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Develops a diagnosis based on the DSM-5 but it is missing some elements. Includes a rationale that doesn’t accurately differentiate between substance dependence and substance abuse

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 13 (6.50%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. diagnosis based on the DSM-5 is inaccurate or missing. Rationale that distinguishes features between substance dependence and substance abuse is inaccurate or missing

Design and Mechanics

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors; APA style is accurate with no errors

Points Range:8 (4.00%) - 8 (4.00%)

Almost no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors (1-3); APA style is accurate with 1-3 errors

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 7 (3.50%)

Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors (4-10); APA style has numerous errors (4-10).

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 6 (3.00%)

Numerous grammatical and punctuation errors (more than 10); APA style is inaccurate more than 10 errors

Accuracy of responses Question 5
Analyze and discuss how the mental health issues in the case study are either caused by or exacerbated by substance addiction (1-2 pages)
25 points

Points Range:18 (9.00%) - 20 (10.00%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Clearly analyzes and discusses how the mental health issues in the case study are either caused by or exacerbated by substance addiction (1-2 pages)

Points Range:16 (8.00%) - 17 (8.50%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a broad analysis and discussion on how the mental health issues in the case study are either caused by or exacerbated by substance addiction (1-2 pages)

Points Range:14 (7.00%) - 15 (7.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Provides a minimal analysis and discussion on how the mental health issues in the case study are either caused by or exacerbated by substance addiction

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 13 (6.50%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Analysis and discussion on how the mental health issues in the case study are either caused by or exacerbated by substance addiction is missing or inaccurate.

Accuracy of Responses Question 6
Discuss the genetic, biological, environmental, social, psychological, and/or philosophical elements that might impact the case (1-2 pages).
20 points

Points Range:18 (9.00%) - 20 (10.00%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough discussion of the genetic, biological, environmental, social, psychological, and/or philosophical elements that might impact the case (1-2 pages).

Points Range:16 (8.00%) - 17 (8.50%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses the genetic, biological, environmental, social, psychological, and/or philosophical elements that might impact the case (1-2 pages).

Points Range:14 (7.00%) - 15 (7.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of the genetic, biological, environmental, social, psychological, and/or philosophical elements that might impact the case

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 13 (6.50%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of the genetic, biological, environmental, social, psychological, and/or philosophical elements that might impact the case is inaccurate or missing.

Accuracy of Responses Question 7
Discuss the special needs and treatment recommendations related to dual diagnosis (1-2 pages).
25 points

Points Range:18 (9.00%) - 20 (10.00%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough discussion of the special needs and treatment recommendations related to dual diagnosis (1-2 pages).

Points Range:16 (8.00%) - 17 (8.50%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses the special needs and treatment recommendations related to dual diagnosis (1-2 pages).

Points Range:14 (7.00%) - 15 (7.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of the special needs and treatment recommendations related to dual diagnosis

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 13 (6.50%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of the special needs and treatment recommendations related to dual diagnosis is inaccurate or missing.

Accuracy of Responses Question 8
Analyze and apply the main techniques, strategies, or approaches of common treatment options for the case study selected (include a chart with short rationale).
15 points

Points Range:13 (6.50%) - 15 (7.50%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough Analysis of at least five main techniques, strategies, or approaches of common treatment options for the case study selected (includes a chart with short rationale).

Points Range:12 (6.00%) - 12 (6.00%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses 3-5 main techniques, strategies, or approaches of common treatment options for the case study selected (includes a chart with short rationale).

Points Range:10 (5.00%) - 11 (5.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of the main techniques, strategies, or approaches of common treatment options for the case study selected (includes a chart with short rationale).

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 9 (4.50%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Analysis of the main techniques, strategies, or approaches of common treatment options for the case study selected is inaccurate or missing.

Accuracy of Responses Question 9
Explain the typical risk and protective factors that impact the individual in the case study (2-3 paragraphs).
30 points

Points Range:22 (11.00%) - 25 (12.50%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough discussion of at least 3 typical risk and protective factors that impact the individual in the case study (2-3 paragraphs).

Points Range:20 (10.00%) - 21 (10.50%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses at least 3 typical risk and protective factors that impact the individual in the case study (2-3 paragraphs).

Points Range:17 (8.50%) - 19 (9.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of the typical risk and protective factors that impact the individual in the case study

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 16 (8.00%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of the typical risk and protective factors that impact the individual in the case study is inaccurate or missing.

Accuracy of Responses Question 10
Describe the efforts you would include toward relapse and prevention and structure a treatment plan that incorporates these concepts (1-2 pages).
25 points

Points Range:22 (11.00%) - 25 (12.50%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough discussion of the efforts you would include toward relapse and prevention and structure a treatment plan that incorporates these concepts (1-2 pages).

Points Range:20 (10.00%) - 21 (10.50%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses the efforts you would include toward relapse and prevention and structure a treatment plan that incorporates these concepts (1-2 pages).

Points Range:17 (8.50%) - 19 (9.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of efforts you would include toward relapse and prevention and structure a treatment plan that incorporates these concepts.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 18 (9.00%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of the efforts you would include toward relapse and prevention and structure a treatment plan that incorporates these concepts is inaccurate or missing.

Accuracy of Responses Question 11
Analyze and discuss any ethical or legal issues inherent in this case (1-2 paragraphs).
10 points

Points Range:9 (4.50%) - 10 (5.00%)

Questions are accurately and thoroughly answered. Provides a clear and thorough discussion of the ethical or legal issues inherent in this case (1-2 paragraphs).

Points Range:8 (4.00%) - 8 (4.00%)

Questions are partially accurate but most to all are answered. Discusses the ethical or legal issues inherent in this case (1-2 paragraphs).

Points Range:7 (3.50%) - 7 (3.50%)

Answers are more inaccurate than accurate OR many are unanswered. Minimal discussion of the ethical or legal issues inherent in this case.

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 6 (3.00%)

Answers are completely inaccurate or missing. Review of the ethical or legal issues inherent in this case is inaccurate or missing.