Main Paper Topic (4) Case Study on Death and Dying The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and unders

Main Paper Topic (4) Case Study on Death and Dying

The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and understanding of a diversity of faith expressions; for the purpose of this course, the focus will be on the Christian worldview.

Based on "Case Study: End of Life Decisions," the Christian worldview, and the worldview questions presented in the required topic study materials you will complete an ethical analysis of George's situation and his decision from the perspective of the Christian worldview.

Provide a 1,500-2,000-word ethical analysis while answering the following questions:

1) How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the fallenness of the world?

2) How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the hope of resurrection?

3) As George contemplates life with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), how would the Christian worldview inform his view about the value of his life as a person?

4) What sorts of values and considerations would the Christian worldview focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia?

5) Given the above, what options would be morally justified in the Christian worldview for George and why?

6) Based on your worldview, what decision would you make if you were in George's situation?

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.


Case Study: End of Life Decisions

George is a successful attorney in his mid-fifties. He is also a legal scholar, holding a teaching post at the local university law school in Oregon. George is also actively involved in his teenage son’s basketball league, coaching regularly for their team. Recently, George has experienced muscle weakness and unresponsive muscle coordination. He was forced to seek medical attention after he fell and injured his hip. After an examination at the local hospital following his fall, the attending physician suspected that George may be showing early symptoms for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a degenerative disease affecting the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord. The week following the initial examination, further testing revealed a positive diagnosis of ALS.

ALS is progressive and gradually causes motor neuron deterioration and muscle atrophy to the point of complete muscle control loss. There is currently no cure for ALS, and the median life expectancy is between 3 and 4 years, though it is not uncommon for some to live 10 or more years. The progressive muscle atrophy and deterioration of motor neurons leads to the loss of the ability to speak, move, eat, and breathe. However, sight, touch, hearing, taste, and smell are not affected. Patients will be wheelchair bound and eventually need permanent ventilator support to assist with breathing.

George and his family are devastated by the diagnosis. George knows that treatment options only attempt to slow down the degeneration, but the symptoms will eventually come. He will eventually be wheelchair bound and be unable to move, eat, speak, or even breathe on his own.

In contemplating his future life with ALS, George begins to dread the prospect of losing his mobility and even speech. He imagines his life in complete dependence upon others for basic everyday functions and perceives the possibility of eventually degenerating to the point at which he is a prisoner in his own body. Would he be willing to undergo such torture, such loss of his own dignity and power? George thus begins inquiring about the possibility of voluntary euthanasia.

Topic 4: Optional Study Materials

Introduction to Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoint

"Introduction to Euthanasia: Opposing Viewpoints," edited by Torr, from Opposing Viewpoints in Context (2000).

https://link-galegroup-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/apps/doc/EJ3010134156/OVIC?u=canyonuniv&sid=OVIC&xid=15c2bdc9

Ethics and Life's Ending: An Exchange

"Ethics and Life's Ending: An Exchange," by Orr and Meilaender, from First Things (2004) https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rfh&AN=ATLA0001442679&site=ehost-live&scope=site


Always Care, Never Kill: How Physician-Assisted Suicide Endangers the Weak, Corrupts Medicine, Compromises the Family, and Violates Human Dignity and Equality.

"Always Care, Never Kill: How Physician-Assisted Suicide Endangers the Weak, Corrupts Medicine, Compromises the Family, and Violates Human Dignity and Equality," by Anderson, on The Heritage Foundation website (2015)

https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/report/always-care-never-kill-how-physician-assisted-suicide-endangers-the-weak

Pain Management Rather Than Assisted Suicide: The Ethical High Ground

"Pain Management Rather Than Assisted Suicide: The Ethical High Ground," by Orr, from Pain Medicine(2001).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=4883594&site=ehost-live&scope=site

The Higher-Brain Concept of Death: A Christian Theological Appraisal

"The Higher-Brain Concept of Death: A Christian Theological Appraisal," by Roberts, from Ethics & Medicine (2017).

https://search-proquest com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1953801344/8E15777163CE4CF4PQ/9?accountid=7374

Three End-of-Life Cases: Resolving Their Moral Dilemmas

"Three End-of-Life Cases: Resolving Their Moral Dilemmas," by Mirkes, from Ethics & Medicine (2017)

https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1901683914/fulltextPDF/79642D3CA804C4FPQ/8?accountid=7374

© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.