Type a one-page abstract of an empirical article from a professional journal where the author(s) describe the purpose, method, and results of a scientific investigation. Some examples of relevant jou
Professional Journal AssignmentThe purpose of this assignment is to provide students an opportunity to familiarize themselves with published research. The tasks of the assignment are as follows:
Choose an empirical article from a professional journal where the author(s) describe the purpose, method, and results of a scientific investigation. Some examples of relevant journals in Developmental Psychology are:
Developmental Psychology
Human Development
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly
Child Development
Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Aging and Cognition
Psychology and Aging
Research on Aging
Journal of Black Psychology
Developmental Review
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences
Death Studies
Note that not all research articles are complicated reading. As a novice, it might help to browse through the journals until you come upon one that is of interest as well as readable.
Identify your article by including a full APA style reference of it at the top of your assignment.
Briefly summarize the research article using the headings most common to such empirical reports. These include the Introduction, which generally states a rationale for the investigation and the purpose of the study. The introduction also reviews relevant research. Next is the Method section, which includes a description of the participants, instruments, and procedures. The Results section follows next, which addresses the significant findings of the study. Finally, comes the Discussion and conclusion where the author(s) summarize(s) the findings and future directions.
Note that in writing an abstract you do not want to reproduce or summarize the entire article. Rather, you want to provide the most salient information, as succinctly as possible in each of the aforementioned areas. Further, in some instances you might choose to replicate or incorporate part of the original text. In these cases you MUST put quotation marks around the words you are copying, followed by the page number in parentheses.
Type your one-page abstract.
Handout 1-5
Sample Abstract
Oltjenbruns, K. A. (1991). Positive outcomes of adolescents’ experience with grief. Journal of Adolescent Research, 6 (1), 43-53.
INTRODUCTION
Reports suggest that by the time youngsters finish high school 90 percent of them will have experienced the death of a family member or friend. Yet, there is very little grief-related literature examining adolescent populations, particularly in terms of possible positive outcomes to grief. Thus, the purpose of this research was to “examine the perceptions of older adolescents regarding positive outcomes, if any, to the grief experience” and “to determine if there are significant differences in responses related to ethnicity, gender, or the personality variable of locus of control” (p. 46).
METHOD
Participants
Research packets were mailed to a computer generated random sample list of 1,200 addresses. A total of 336 individuals returned consent forms and completed surveys, however, only 93 fit the criteria for inclusion in the study. Of these 93 participants, 37 percent were Mexican-American, 63 percent were Anglo-American, 28 percent were male, and 72 percent were female. The age range of participants was 16 to 22 years old.
Procedure
Participants responded to the question “What positive outcomes, if any, do you feel were the result of your grief experience(s)? Check all that apply” (p. 47). Seven checklist options were included, for example, “have a deeper appreciation for life, developed emotional strength, and increased empathy for others” (p. 47). In order to measure the personality variable, participants also responded to the Rotter I-E Locus of Control Scale.
RESULTS
Results indicated that 96 percent of the participants identified at least one positive outcome. The most frequent positive outcomes were “deeper appreciation of life (74 percent), greater caring for loved ones (67 percent), strengthened emotional bonds with others (56 percent), and developed emotional strength (53 percent)” (p. 48). The less noted positive outcomes were “increased empathy for others (47 percent), better communication skills (28 percent), and enhanced problem solving skills (9 percent)” (p. 48). Chi-square tests with Yates correction formula were computed to determine if there were significant differences in responses between ethnic groups or gender. No differences were found. However, “significantly more persons with an internal locus of control orientation reported that better communication skills were a positive outcome of their grief experience (X2 = 4.153 [1, N = 93], p < .05)” (p. 48). Some participants added positive outcomes that were not included in the list, for example, “put priorities in a different perspective and made me more independent” (p. 49).
DISCUSSION
It is suggested that learning more about adolescent grief reactions, both painful and positive outcomes, can be beneficial for both the griever and helper. It is also suggested that more research be conducted.
EVALUATING RESEARCH
Step | Critical Thinking Questions |
1. Initial observations: the idea | 1. What idea or theory underlies this study? 2. What are some assumptions the researcher is making? 3. Is the idea derived from a larger theory and, if so, is it consistent with that theory? 4. Is the context of the problem being taken into account? |
2. The hypothesis | 1. Is this a testable (answerable) question? 2. Are there any hidden assumptions in the way the research question is stated? 3. Is the researcher introducing any bias into the study? |
3. The method | 1. Does this approach make sense to you? 2. Is it logically derived from the theory? 3. If it is a laboratory design, how well does it capture the real world? 4. Are any variables being introduced via the design which may distort the results? |
4. The experiment (collecting data) | 1. Are the results accurate? 2. Are the results presented in appropriate context? 3. What is not being reported? 4. Are these results consistent and expected with what is already known? 5. Are there opposing ways of analyzing the results? |
5. Criticism | 1. Do these results make sense? 2. Could you generate alternative explanations? 3. What is being presented as factual that may be an opinion or a subjectively held value? |
6. Further studies | 1. How do you evaluate different explanations for results? 2. Is one better than another? 3. Can they be synthesized into a new alternative? |
Source:
Coats, E.J., Feldman, R. S., & Schwartzberg, S. (1994). Critical thinking: General principles and case studies (pp. 29 - 33). New York: McGraw-Hill.