no plagarism please
IHP 420 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Overview: The final case study for this course will require you to analyze a court decision in which a physician was found liable for m edical malpractice. You will focus on facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation, and you will explain how they were applied to law. You will then use the facts of the case to identify an ethics issue and determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe, quality healthc are experience for the patient. Next, you will apply a clinician –patie nt shared decision -making model to describe how the ethics issue could be resolved. You will also include a discussion about possible violations of the code of ethics in your given field. Lastly, you will augment or vary the facts of the case to crea te a h ypothetical scenario that changes the outcome so that the physician is no longer liable for medical malpractice. Prompt: In this project, you will analyze a court case involving medical malpractice. For this milestone, you will use the facts from the orig inal case to identify an ethics issue, determine an ethical theory that would help provide a safe and quality healthcare experience for the patient, a nd apply a clinician –patient shared decision -making model. III. Ethical Component: In this section, you will e valuate the case to identify the specific ethical issues and determine ethical theories and shared decision - making models that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience. Then, you will propose and defend ethical guidel ines for healthcare providers to follow in order to avoid future incidents. A. Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident. Support your response with research and relevant exa mples from the case. B. Describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case. C. Select a physician –patient shared decision -making model and explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient D. Propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents. E. Defend how your proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and t he public. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your paper should be a 2 - to 3 -page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12 -point Times New Roman font, one -inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format. Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident ( 0%) Value Ethical Component: Ethical Issues Describes the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explains why the issues are credited with causing the incident, and supports with research and relevant examples Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explains why the issues are credited with causing the incident, but description lacks details or does not support with research and relevant examples Does not describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and does not explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident 18 Ethical Component: Ethical Theory Describes an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, and supports with research and relevant examples from the case Describes an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but desc ription lacks detail, is illogical, or does not support with research or relevant examples Does not describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient 18 Ethical Component:Shared Decision - Making Model Selects a physician –patient shared decision -making model and explains how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient Selects a physician –patient shared decision -making model and explains how it would prov ide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but explanation lacks detail Does not select a physician – patient shared decision -making model and does not explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient 18 Ethical Component:
Ethical Guidelines Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents, but proposal is cursory Does not propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent current and future incidents 18 Ethical Component: Defend Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public, but def ense lacks detail or is illogical Does not defend how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public 18 Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has c ritical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%
