No plagiarism and no high turn-in

1 Final Project II Guidelines and Rubric Overview Healthcare professionals provide support throughout the cycle of life, from birth to death. They have an obligation to provid e humane and compassionate care to patients while adhering to their specific field’s code of ethics. Sometimes, healthcare professionals are privy to discuss ions between family members regarding end -of-life issues. In some instances, a healthcare facility may be in cha rge of providing information about advance directives to patients. Healthcare professionals should calibrate their own moral beliefs to align with their ethical and legal obligations. By studying issues contained within real -life cases, healthcare professi onals can come to terms with their beliefs and obligations relative to end -of-life issues. For Final Project II, you will submit a draft of your essay for your Milestone Three assignment, which will be submitted to s caffold learning and ensure quality fin al submissions. This milestone draft will be submitted in Module Six. The final product will be submitted in Module Eight. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:  Analyze bioethical issues faced by various healthcare professionals for their impact on decision making Prompt In this project, you will analyze the Terri Schiavo case through the lens of the bioethical issue(s) related to the case. You will analyze the case to address what the bioethical issue is and what role end -of-life issues, such as self -determination and advanced directives, played in the case. Using your analysis, you will determine how this bioethical issue impacted the decisions made by the healthcare professionals involved in the case. Your essay must address the following critical elements : I. Introduction : Describe the provided case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the bioethical issue, and the time period o f the incident that occurred. II. Bioethical Analysis: Analyze th e bioethical issue for the role end -of-life issues played in the case. Be sure to use appropriate terminology and support with secondary research. III. Conclusion: Describe how the bioethical issue influenced the decisions of healthcare professionals involved in the case. Be sure to use specific examples. 2 Milestone Three : Draft of Final Project II: Bioethics Milestones In Module Six , you will analyze the Terri Schiavo case through the lens of bioethics. You will address what the bioethical issue is and what role end -of-life issues, such as self -determination and advanced directives, played in the case. Using your analysis, you will determine how this bioethical issue impacted the decisions made by the healthcare professionals involved in the case. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Three Rubric. Final Submission : Bioethical Short Paper In Module 8 , you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project 2: B ioethics Rubric. Final Project II Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your bioethical short paper should be a 1 - to 2 -page Microsoft Word document formatted with 12 -point Times New Roman font and one -inch margins. All citations and references should be form atted according to the most recent APA guidelines. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Introduction Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description provides exceptional insight into the main components of the case Describes the provided case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the bioethical issue, and the time period of the incident that occurred Describe the provided case, but description is cursory or illogical, contains inaccuracies, or does not include information on the stakeholders, bioethical issue, or time period of the incident Does not describe the provided case 31.15 Bioethical Analysis Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the role that end -of-life issues played in the case Analyzes the bioethical issue for the role end -of-life issues played in the case, utilizing appropriate terminology and supporting with secondary research Analyzes the bioethical issue for the role end -of-life issues played in the case, but analysis is cursory or illogical, contains inaccuracies, does not use appropriate terminology, or is not supported with secondary research Does not analyze the bioethical issue for the role end -of-life issues played in the case 31.15 3 Conclusion Meets “Proficient” criteria, and examples provided demonstrate a complex grasp of how the bioethical issue impacted the decisions of the healthcare professionals in the case Describes how the bioethical issue impacted the decisions of healthcare professionals involved in the case, and uses specific examples Describes how the bioethical issue impacted the decisions of the healthcare professionals in the case, but description is cursory or illogical, contains ina ccuracies, or is not supported by specific examples Does not describe how the bioethical issue impacted the decisions of healthcare professionals involved in the case 31.15 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy -to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar , spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 6.55 Total 100%