EDUC 735 WK 8 The purpose of this assignment is to help you gain experience with a realistic topic/issue in your current position or in a future position you hope to obtain. Before you begin, think ab
EDUC 735
Presentation Project Grading Rubric
| Criteria | Levels of Achievement | |||
| Content 70% | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present |
| Historical Context in the Description Summary | 18 to 20 points The historical context of the issue is thoroughly and accurately addressed. Ideas are supported by credible research. Significant insight is provided by the author. | 17 points The historical context of the issue is accurate. Ideas are mostly supported by credible research. Some insight is provided by the author. | 1 to 16 points Some aspects of the historical context are provided but the development of ideas is insufficient. There is little insight provided by the author. | 0 points Not present |
| Current Strategies in the Description Summary | 18 to 20 points The description of the issue is thorough, current, and accurate and provides meaningful insight. Current strategies are provided that address the issue. Significant insight is provided by the author. | 17 points The description of the issue is somewhat current and accurate. Some strategies are provided that address the issue. Some insight is provided by the author. | 1 to 16 points The issue is not well-described. Sufficient strategies are not addressed. There is little insight provided by the author. | 0 points Not present |
| Clarity of Action Plan | 37 to 40 points An innovative, comprehensive, clear plan is presented that will help to address the issue. Research and data is utilized and cited to make informed decisions that guide the plan. | 34 to 36 points A clear plan is presented that will help to address the issue. Some research and data is consulted to make informed decisions that guide the plan. | 1 to 33 points A plan is presented, but it is not clear that it will address the issue. Little or no research is used from credible sources. | 0 points Not present |
| Resources in the Action Plan | 28 to 30 points The Action Plan thoroughly delineates the resources that will be needed for implementation of the plan with a detailed description (e.g., any additional faculty, any additional training of faculty, physical resources, financial implications, etc.). | 25 to 27 points The Action Plan delineates some of the resources that will be needed for implementation of the plan (e.g., any additional faculty, any additional training of faculty, physical resources, financial implications, etc.). | 1 to 24 points The Action Plan does not delineate most resources that would be needed for implementation. | 0 points Not present |
| Presentation | 28 to 30 points The presentation is a thorough, well developed visual representation of the Action Plan that the audience will clearly understand. The presentation is innovative, creative, visually appealing and will highly persuade the audience to pursue the plan (e.g., the charts, graphs, graphics, transitions, special effects, etc., are highly engaging). | 25 to 27 points The presentation accurately represents the Action Plan and the audience will understand it. The presentation is visually appealing and would persuade the audience to pursue the plan. | 1 to 24 points The presentation mostly represents the plan but may have some unclear sections. The presentation has some visual appeal and needs more development to persuade the audience to pursue the plan. | 0 points Not present |
| Structure 30% | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present |
| Grammar, Usage, and Mechanics | 18 to 20 points
| 17 points
|
| 0 points Not present |
| Format | 18 to 20 points Current APA format is used accurately and consistently in all citations. | 17 points Current APA format is used with minor errors. | 1 to 16 points There are frequent errors in current APA format. | 0 points Not present |
| Sources | 18 to 20 points Assertions in the paper are clear and supported by current, credible research. At least 5 sources are used. Attribution is clear and fairly represented. | 17 points Assertions are supported by credible research. Less than 5 sources are used. Attribution is mostly clear. | 1 to 16 points Assertions and attributions are not clear. Less than 5 sources are used. | 0 points Not present |
Page 3 of 3
