3-1 Case Study 2: Franklin Industries Whistleblowing please see the attached documents

ACC 696 Case Study 2 Rubric For this case study, you will assess a Franklin Industries’ Whistleblowing case study for the relation of ethical decision -making and the responsibilities of the accountant. Please review the evaluation criteria in the rubric below, which highlights grading information . Prompt: Read case study 3 -4 in your text and answer the questions that follow. Your responses should be detailed and well -articulated. Your conclusions should be based on concepts and theories from your text, you should provide examples when applicable, and your writing should be pro fessional and error -fre e. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Case Analysis Meets “P rofic ient” criteria and provides examples Analyzes case study questions with details and explanations Analyzes case study questions with minor gaps in details and explanations; has difficulty in applying both technical and communicative proficiency Does not pro vide in -depth analysis for the required case study questions 40 Conclusions Meets “P roficient” criteria , and conclusions are compared to current workplace scenarios Draws conclusions that are justified with evidence Draws logical conclusions, but does not defend with evidence Does not draw logical conclusions 35 Articulation of Response Meets “P roficient” criteria and is presented in a professional and easy -to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or o rganization and is of a sufficient length to provide necessary details in answering the question Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas. Answers are brief and lacking in detail Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas. Answers fail to address all parts of the question or omit important details 25 Earned Total 100%