can someone write this paper for me please

Writing assignment 2

OVERVIEW: 

Virtually all human outcomes, abilities, and behaviors reflect a complex interaction of nature (biological factors) and nurture (social-environmental factors).  For example, many psychological processes that were once assumed to be “basic” and uniform across all humans were later found to differ across cultures, suggesting that the unique environments in which people are raised can shape the emergence of basic biological processes.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

1) Students will choose one of the provided peer-review articles to read and report. 

2) Students will summarize and interpret the chosen, peer-reviewed article that describes a cross-cultural difference in some psychological process.  

4) Students will review learned information from the text, lecture, and associated course materials pertaining to the topic discussed in the chosen peer-reviewed article.

5) Students will compose a well-written, scientific report, targeting the writing requirements (below).  General formatting and guidelines are as follows (regardless of the peer-review article chosen): 

GENERAL FORMATTING GUIDELINES:

• 5 -3 pages long (range is firm; not including the title and reference page)

• Double-spaced

• Size 12 Times New Roman font

• 1” margins

• Title page

• Reference page (NOT "works cited")

• NO QUOTES ARE ALLOWED. You must PARAPHRASE!

SCIENTIFIC WRITING REQUIREMENTS (see Integrative Writing for additional assistance):

• APA formatting is required

  • Free and recommended website: Purdue Owl https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html(Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)

• Refrain from using pronouns (including third person).  Instead, restate the concept, construct, or term in each sentence.  A pronoun is appropriate to use when the term is previously identified in the same sentence.  

• Do not use any quotes. Instead, carefully and thoroughly paraphrase the author's idea to synthesize authentic ideas. You will be penalized for using quotes.

• Be comprehensive but concise.  

  • Make sure the main argument is clearly identified and that the paper includes concrete examples.

  • Make sure each paragraph makes a clear point.

  • Make sure the ordering of points from paragraph to paragraph is logical and transition sentences are included to enhance flow of information.

• Proper spelling, grammar, style, and writing quality are all very important.

PEER-REVIEW ARTICLES:

• Option #1: Peer-reviewed review paper

  • Topic: Causal Attributions in Social Situations

  • Peer-review article: Norenzayan, A., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture and causal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 132-135.

  • Article link: Norenzayan, & Nisbett, (2000) paper (Links to an external site.)

https://cdn.inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net/6c7821d3-bea0-4835-bc41-04f34c06f040/Norenzayan%26Nisbett%20current%20dir.pdf?token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCIsImtpZCI6ImNkbiJ9.eyJyZXNvdXJjZSI6Ii82Yzc4MjFkMy1iZWEwLTQ4MzUtYmM0MS0wNGYzNGMwNmYwNDAvTm9yZW56YXlhbiUyNk5pc2JldHQlMjBjdXJyZW50JTIwZGlyLnBkZiIsInRlbmFudCI6ImNhbnZhcyIsInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsImlhdCI6MTYxNzAzMzc2NSwiZXhwIjoxNjE3MTIwMTY1fQ.kK9ldvl9POdiuTUxesC2Tey_tOzhT4dwru5p0yDvGrKGzN9gfARo93lolXQBqGBR1zm0CzYvpy270rxpdUvf0A&download=1&content_type=application%2Fpdf

• Option # 2: Peer-reviewed primary research article

  • Topic:

  • Peer-review article: Becker, Butz, Sibley, Barlow, Bitacola, Christ, … & Wright (2017). What do national flags stand for? An exploration of associations across 11 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(3), 335-352.

  • Article link: Becker et al. (2017) paper (Links to an external site.)

https://cdn.inst-fs-iad-prod.inscloudgate.net/46ba2f0c-fbb9-4095-910e-39cf7f93e4e4/Becker%20et%20al.%202017.pdf?token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCIsImtpZCI6ImNkbiJ9.eyJyZXNvdXJjZSI6Ii80NmJhMmYwYy1mYmI5LTQwOTUtOTEwZS0zOWNmN2Y5M2U0ZTQvQmVja2VyJTIwZXQlMjBhbC4lMjAyMDE3LnBkZiIsInRlbmFudCI6ImNhbnZhcyIsInVzZXJfaWQiOm51bGwsImlhdCI6MTYxNzAzMjU4NSwiZXhwIjoxNjE3MTE4OTg1fQ.VZRxYp9xKyoOLZJ1JUXn1I1IhBIJ_AzyeQgTaPVLyfczbvmeMak2t7cAjLb4iTvowKIdZffLqTbnIusipwRXYw&download=1&content_type=application%2Fpdf

WRITING INSTRUCTIONS (regardless of peer-review article chosen):

1. Define and summarize the specific psychological process(es), behavior, or phenomenon investigated in the chosen peer-reviewed article (0.5 -1 page).

   • Clearly identify and explain the necessary psychological concepts.

   • The identified descriptions included in the paper should be related to theory and include enough detail so that a naïve reader could fully understand the topic of the article. 

2. Identify the features of the groups (cultures) that were being compared in the study (0.5 pages).

   • Describe the groups in enough detail so that it is clear where they were recruited and how they differ from each other:

     • For example: Are these people from different countries?  If so, what countries? 

     • For example: Are the groups within the same country but raised within separate subcultures or communities?

1. Briefly describe and evaluate the findings of the study (0.5- 1 page).

   • Identify exactly which behavior(s) or response(s) were measured and the differences that were observed.

     • For example: how do people from these different groups or cultures behave or think differently?

   • Use psychological theories to explain why the group differences existed.

   • Describe the unique life experiences, backgrounds, prior learning, etc., that presumably accounted for the observed findings.

     • For example: Why were these groups different?