Hello, I have a paper that is written, and I need you to rewrite my paper so that it is a logical analysis; it needs to be 5 pages, and I will provide all the articles for you to use, and I will provi

KAINE

Makayla Kaine

William Lyons

Law, Mediation and Violence

13 April 2021

Final Paper

INTRODUCTION

The key socio-demographic influences connected with beliefs toward welfare benefits, racial, and societal matters, such as social status, ethnicity, and spirituality, are cross-cutting.  Furthermore, agenda setting is something that has not only affected us but it afftects the issues we so deeply care about. Elites have used this to remain in control and to not really helpm anyone but themselves. This paper will highlight conflict displacement and how elites use this to not only one up but to also disproportianlly affect minorities. Minorities know that this affects them and they feel like they are never gonna win this battle. Minorities are sick of feeling this way so now they have publicized their conflict in effort to show that the elites are only using them. These influemces have know shown that elites are gonna continue to dom this for many years to come.




THE ONE IDEA IS…

There are three types of conflict displacement, and the article I am focusing on is Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate. By: Geoffrey C. Laymen & Thomas M. Carsey. The main reason for selecting this article is because I am attempting to comprehend how conflict displacement among elites can affect the American people.

Laymen and Carsey argue that the Democratic and Republican elites use conflict displacement when talking about government assistance programs, racial and social issues to remain in power. Elites don't talk about these topics because they do not care about what people are going through. They only bring it up so it can go on the agenda. Once Democratic or Republican elites get their conflict on the agenda. They will use this issue to blame the other elites for not improving these low-income areas where there are racial and social issues and a high amount of people living off government assistance. Instead, elites publicizing this conflict only benefit themselves because everyone will talk about it and keeps the conflict on the agenda. People know that these elites do not care about them. People feel they are heard by elites when it's a competition of putting their issues on the agenda. This has validated the argument that elites only care about the maintaining of power in conflict displacement.

Conflict displacement normally does not expect that changes in elite positions on issues would cause actual voters to shift their positions on issues. Voters believe that these causes will not get changed, and there will no be change. So, people usually just either don't vote, or they just keep their opinions to themselves. This is very alarming for our country, and change does need to occur.

The Idea is Important Because…

Racial conflicts such as equal rights, homosexuality, and abortion and cultural rights like prayers in schools and domestic rights divide the elites inside and not externally. Conversely, racial issues divide the democrats from the republicans even more as the latter is more reserved on this issue. There is substantial evidence that even the party leaders' conference delegates and progressive political leaders have been more divided on social welfare, race, and culture.

Schattschneider argues that the elites use conflict displacement to make sure they remain in control. Elites typically struggle with the scope of publicization and privatization on huge topics such as race and social welfare. For Elites to manage the change, the venue reframes how the public thinks and displaces conflicts. These three forms of conflict displacement have worked for many years. Especially against race, elites have taken minority's problems and publicized them so that their plan can remain on top. Elites just want to throw these problems at each other, and there is no real solution.

Conservative elites advocate for self-help services, the proliferation of African American businesses, as well as non-preferential workplace conditions. Liberal elites ignore the self-destructive challenge are hesitant to discuss history, the environment of definitions and beliefs frankly. Conservative elites would discuss thoughts and behaviors like if government and economy were not there. They scarcely, if at all, investigate the many instances wherein the African Americans adhere to the Philosophical tradition while remaining at the foot of the community ladder (Cornel West, 1993). The dispute goes far past the liberal-conservative divide in that we should go where neither democrats nor republicans fear to go: into the dark seas of desperation and fear that fill the streets of African Americans. It's one thing to discuss grim numbers. But confronting the massive extinction of possibility, the tremendous loss of sense, as well as the incredible disrespect of racial minority's health and the environment across most African Americans, is a total exception. The liberal/conservative debate obscures a very fundamental problem confronting African American society today: the fatalistic challenge at its core nature. Frameworks and actions are inextricably linked, and organizations and beliefs are closely intertwined. Their surroundings influence people's actions and lives, but they are not dictated or decided by them. These conditions are malleable. Culture is a system, much like politics or economy; it is embedded in structures like homes, churches, and schools.

In his song' Changes,' Tupac Shakur vividly portrays the conflicts people of color face every day. They are killed in the streets by the police while the government plays a blind eye to these injustices. Instead of prosecuting the police, elites see this act as a relief to the government. The elites fuel this dispute by legalizing gun possession and allowing the smuggling of drugs into black societies. Hence promoting and widening the gap of racism. Tupac calls for a change. He challenges the political system to promote social justice among the American community. He reminds the system of the old ways that were filled with hate and racial stereotypes failed. However, people of color are being discriminated even today, all they have to do is only survive. Rather than fighting poverty, the elites prefer to fight drugs. They are selfish and hate it when the Black Americans progress in life. This song is an awakening call to the government, to the people of color and to the world to be vigilant in fighting for and promoting equal rights across all levels of the society.

One of the main examples of racial inequality is Fergusons Municpalities. Ferguson's policing and municipal court procedures represent and perpetuate pre-existing racial profiling, namely prejudices based on race. Ferguson's specific results show strong socioeconomic differences that disproportionately affect African Americans. The data suggests that racial motive is a contributing factor to these differences. Ferguson's policing and civil court policies have bred profound distrust between members of the population and the law enforcement body, weakening local police authority in especially among African Americans. Ferguson's criminal justice policies was influenced by the City's focus on money instead of crime prevention. This reliance on money has harmed the systemic structure of Ferguson's security force, adding to a history of discriminatory governance, but has affected its municipal judiciary, resulting in practices which pose fair trial questions and cause undue damage on Ferguson residents.

Elites need to see that around our country these things are happening to minrorities and on tool that they can use is Getting To Yes . If elites could know how to bargain then when they are conflict displacing it could go smoother. Elites negotiate even when they do not consider themselves to be doing so. An elites bargains about which issue to put on the agenda and how they are gonna do it. Negotiating process is a fundamental method of obtaining what you want from someone else. It is curved interaction aimed at striking a deal when you and the other party share some preferences but disagree on someone else.







Final Thoughts …

Party polarization and “Conflict Extension” in the American Electorate, Getting To Yes, DOJ FERGUSON, The semisovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America, Nihilism in black America, helped me understand that these problems, which have a huge effect on many human livelihoods, are only interesting until another confrontation is replaced with this one. I've stayed in low-income neighborhoods. I've gone through similar problems in the past. I can frankly claim that people believe the elites don't care for people who are perpetually impoverished and depend on government aid. They are still not concerned with a racist institution that is working against everyone. The authorities have often highlighted these topics in order to create a message that progress is on the way. Conversely, they just do it for selfish enrichment and to keep the controversy on the table.

Even if political elites become more fragmented on both sides, mass political division on one topic platform inevitably leads to reduced division on another. It does, however, imagine a broad and uniform citizen reaction to elite political division. To characterize mass opinion by the solid left component considered by political restructuring, most people will have to follow political leaders' guidance and seek out consistently progressive or universally republican stances on all three national issue priorities.


Works Cited

Fisher, Roger, Ury, William 1922-2012. Getting To Yes : Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. Boston :Houghton Mifflin, 1991.

Layman, Geoffrey C., and Thomas M. Carsey. "Party polarization and" conflict extension" in the American electorate." American Journal of Political Science (2002): 786-802.

Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. The semisovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1975.

Shaw, Theodore M. The Ferguson Report: Department of Justice Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department. , 2015. Print. 

Shakur, Tupac. Changes 1998.

West, Cornel. Nihilism in black America. na, 1993.