Educational and Digital Equity in the Digital Age Assignment Instructions The ISTE standards call on educational leaders to advocate for equitable access to educational technology, digital content, an
EDUC 730
Educational And Digital Equity in the Digital Age Grading Rubric
| Criteria | Levels of Achievement | |||
| Content | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not Present |
| Current Issues | 22 to 24 points The candidate identifies current issues surrounding educational and digital access with solid detail. | 20 to 21 points The candidate generally identifies current issues surrounding educational and digital access providing sufficient detail. | 1 to 19 points The candidate fails to discern current issues surrounding educational and/or digital access and/or information is lacking in detail. | 0 points Not present |
| Identified Gaps | 17 to 18 points The candidate applies data sourcing to identify equity and access gaps that currently exist at either the national, state, or local level providing solid detail. | 15 to 16 points The candidate generally applies data sourcing to identify equity and access gaps that currently exist at either the national, state, or local providing sufficient detail. | 1 to 14 points The candidate fails to adequately apply data sourcing to identify equity and access gaps that currently exist and/or information is lacking in detail. | 0 points Not present |
| Synthesis | 22 to 24 points The candidate synthesizes current literature to explain the importance of equitable access and learning opportunities for all students and why certain gaps in access may exist. | 20 to 21 points The synthesis is somewhat lacking in one or more of the following:
| 1 to 19 points The synthesis is significantly lacking in one or more of the following:
| 0 points Not present |
| Equity as a Form of Justice | 16 to 17 points The candidate advocates for equitable access to educational technology, digital content, and learning opportunities for all students with a focus on underrepresented populations, both in and out of school, and defends their informed view on access as a social justice issue. | 14 to 15 points The candidate generally advocates for equitable access for all students with a focus on underrepresented populations, both in and out of school, and defends their informed view on access as a social justice issue. | 1 to 13 points The candidate fails to adequately advocate for equitable access and learning opportunities for all students, and/or fails to focus on underrepresented populations, and/or fails to defend their view on access as a social justice issue. | 0 points Not present |
| Strategies | 16 to 17 points The candidate determines strategies for addressing identified gaps to best ensure equitable access. | 14 to 15 points The candidate generally identifies strategies for addressing identified gaps to ensure equitable access. | 1 to 13 points The candidate only somewhat identifies strategies to address gaps and/or strategies do not adequately ensure equitable access. | 0 points Not present |
| Structure | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not Present |
| APA | 6 points The candidate uses correct APA formatting for in-text citations and references throughout the document. | 5 points The candidate only has two or fewer issues of APA formatting for in-text citations and references throughout the document. | 1 to 4 points The candidate has three or more issues of APA formatting for in-text citations and references throughout the document. | 0 points Not present |
| Length and Terminology | 7 points The body of the paper is between 8 and 10 pages in length. The candidate demonstrates appropriate use of the key terminology for the topic. | 6 points The body of the paper is at least 7 pages in length and the candidate generally demonstrates appropriate use of terminology for the topic. | 1 to 5 points The body of the paper is less than 7 pages in length and/or the candidate fails to demonstrate appropriate use of key terminology for the topic. | 0 points Not present |
| References | 11 to 12 points The candidate provides a minimum of 10 references with no fewer than 5 references from scholarly literature, at least 2 of which were published within the last year. | 10 points References are lacking in one or more aspects:
| 1 to 9 points References are lacking in several aspects:
| 0 points Not present |
