Required: Students are required to search for articles published in research journals or magazines of any professional accounting body about a failed ERP implementation. Students are required, to iden

ACCG8150, S2, 2021 Assessment 2: Enterprise Resource Planning Due: 08 October 2021, 5pm . No extensions will be granted. There will be a deduction of 10% of the total available marks made from the total awarded mark for each 24 -hour period or part thereof that the submission is late (for example, 25 hours late in submission – 20% penalty). This penalty does not apply for cases in which an application for Special Consideration is made and approved. Required : Students are required to search for articles published in research journals or magazines of any professional accounting body about a failed ERP implementation. Students are required, to identify and write an analysis on the reasons for the failure and suggest different strategies to avoid such failure/s based on the latest available technology. Format: The word limit is 1500 words. Your word count must be included on your cover page. Nothing is to be excluded from the word count. If you exceed the word limit, 10% of the total marks will be deducted as a penalty. In text referencing is required for all sources used and a complete list of references must be provided using the Harvard Referencing System. Your submission must contain the following ( i.e. all files must be combined into one file and in this order):  Cov er page (You can design your own cover page)  Report  Reference list The style must be as following :  Font - Times New Roman  Size - 12point  Spacing - 1.5 lines  Margins not less than 2.5 cm Each page must have a footer containing the following:  ACCG8150, S2, 2021  Your SID  Page number Submission : This assessment represents 30 % of your total mark for ACCG8150 and is compulsory. The assessment must be submitted in electronic form using Turnitin (through iLearn). Please ensure that you submit before the deadline in case of technical issues. A hardcopy submission is not required. The report can be submitted either in a PDF or word format. The filename of your report must be as follows: ACCG8150_XXXXXXXX (where the crosses represent your SID). All assignments will be manually and electronically checked for plagiarism and it is extremely important that you are familiar with the policy on Academic Honesty. ACCG8150, S2, 2021 Not At tempted Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 1. Identification of failed ERP Not attempted or entirely or significantly plagiarized from other sources. 0 marks Writing is unclear.

Does not identify failed ERP adequately and/or includes incorrect information. Does not refer to research journals or magaz ines of any professional accounting body. 2 marks Writin g is not very clear. Identifies some information related to a failed ERP but in insufficient detail and/or includes incorre ct information. Refers to an approved publication. 2.5 marks Writes clearly and provides relevant examples. Identifies most information related to a failed ERP but misses one or more points or contains insufficient detail. Refers to one or more approved publications. 3.5 marks Writes clearly and provide s relevant examples. Provides a comprehensive overview of a failed ERP. Refers to one or more approved publications. 4 marks Writes clearly and provides relevant examples. Provides a sophisticated overv iew of a failed ERP. Refers to one or more approved publications. 5 marks 2. Analysis of failed ERP Not attempted or entirely or significantly plagiarized from other sources. 0 marks Writing is unclear. Chosen ERP failure is not suitable. Analysis incomplete or mainly faulty. Information predominantly irrelevant. 4 marks Writing is not very clear. Includes the majority of relevant details, although some analysis/ discussion ma y be faulty. Is limited to weak generalisations. 5 marks Write s clearly. Mostly complete explanation.

Includes most relevant details.

Analysis/discussion mostly accurate but more needed. 7 marks Writes clearly. Explanation covers a covers a range of reasons.

Analysis/discussion mostly accurate with adequate detail . 8 marks Writes clearly. Complete explanation in great detail. Analysis/ discussion accurate and insightful. 10 marks ACCG8150, S2, 2021 3.

Recommendations Not attempted or entirely or significantly plagiarized from other sources. 0 marks Writing is unclear.

Provides no recommendation and/or is limited to weak generalisations. 4 marks Writing is not very clear. Provides recommendations but in insufficient detail . 5 marks Writes clearly and provides recommendations in sufficient detail. Provides a link to latest technology available. 7 marks Writes clearly and provides recommendations in great detail. Provides a strong link to latest technology available. 8 marks Writes clearly and provides recommendations in great d etail. Provides a strong link to latest technology available. Provide own opinions to conclude this case. 10 marks 4. Document formatting and written expressions Not attempted or entirely or significantly plagiarized from other sources. 0 marks Fails to follow assignment requirement. Too short or too long.

Strongly affect reader due to formatting errors and confusing organisation. Too informal or errors in grammar make meaning unclear.

Minimal referencing. 2 marks Occasionally meets the as signment requirement.

Distract reader due to formatting errors.

Organisation causes some confusion.

Sometimes too informal or errors in grammar make meaning unclear in places. Noticeable errors in referencing. 2.5 marks Occasionally meets the assignment requirement.

Occasionally include formatting errors.

Organisation of sections and paragraphs generally clear.

Generally appropriate tone.

Frequently used referencing system correctly. 3.5 marks Mostly meets the assignment requirement. Rarely include form atting errors. Clear organisation of sections and paragraphs.

Appropriate tone.

Used referencing consistently and accurately with very few minor errors. 4 marks Meets all the assignment requirements. Use d professional, correct formatting.

Clear organisation of sections and paragraphs with excellent flow.

Appropriate tone.

Used referencing consistently and accurately in all aspects. 5 marks